Another software engineered election......

After George Bushs software engineered election in 2004, there is overwhelming evidence of computer vote fraud in New Hampshire. Rep. Ron Paul who stands for everything that is against the New World Order has been robbed in the primaries. Pauls' proposed destruction of the Federal Reserve would set back the plans of the neocons/illumanati/freemasons/central bankers by at least a century.

How can Paul be near the top in every straw vote and No. 1 in most of them, yet (officially) finish with but 10% in Iowa and 8% in New Hampshire? In a poll from the “Primary New Hampshire�? website, Paul was leading even the eventual “winner�? John McCain at noon on voting day: Paul: 26.5%, McCain 26.4%, and Giuliani at 5.9%. But the finish showed Rudy had jumped to 9%, McCain added nearly half again at 38%, while Paul somehow fell back to 8%.

One of the earmarks of computer vote fraud surfaces when all the candidate’s percentages remain almost the same throughout the evening as the totals increase. This was reflected in the first hour of TV reporting in New Hampshire on January 8. The purpose of torpedoing Paul at this early stage is to keep his name out of the news. He cannot be allowed to win or even make a strong showing in any of the primaries lest the power structure be jeopardized.

http://www.amazon.com/Fooled-Again-Real-Electoral-Reform/dp/0465045804...

The Fox/Faux News snub was the last straw, and when they refused to allow Paul a seat at their New Hampshire debates on January 6, it showed just how far their management will go to deceive the public. The deck is stacked against Paul.

Dr. Paul has scored highly in poll after poll on the Internet and with local straw votes all over the country. His national following is enormous. One NewY ork radio station has him running as high as 60% in recent weeks.

Leonard Seagren, owner of a cigar shop in Portsmouth, N.H., continued his store’s 24-year tradition by conducting a matchbook poll the week prior to the vote. Seagren boasts an 80% accuracy rate over the years. Last week’s results showed Paul winning with 31% over McCain with 27% and Obama beating Hillary again.

How can all of these pollsters be wrong??

There is a little town called Sutton, and 386 people voted there, but not one for Paul, at least not from the official count. However, as of noon the next day, 31 people, after angrily viewing the results in the morning newspaper, had come forward to say publicly that they had voted for Paul.

Sutton, NH Town Clerk/Tax Collector Jennifer Call has admitted to dumping 31 Ron Paul votes but has excused herself with, "It was a mistake."

Of the 302 voting precincts in New Hampshire, 175 were computer-counted and 127 were hand-counted. However, the 175 machines accounted for 81% of the total vote, while the 127 hand-counted areas handled only 19% of the total vote. Of that 19%, however, Paul’s percentage total nearly doubled to 15%.

Barack took a hit too.

People should have the government they elected, not one foisted upon them.

What a waste of time......it's already been determined Hillary will be the next president, no matter how many votes she gets.

By gringoloid on Jan 21, 2008, 12:31 in Off Topic.

gringoloid says on Jan 21, 2008, 12:34:

what a waste....

scotty says on Jan 21, 2008, 13:33:

its to late, the corporations, the media and the special interests groups are now in control of America, and the masses follow along like little sheep and vote the way the media tells them to vote.

Get Rhythm, when you got the blues. Johnny Cash

scotty says on Jan 30, 2008, 02:05:

you can what i said taking place right now before our eyes. who is the media pushing? who is in the lead? who gets most of the press? forget who the people are interested in that means nothing, the press ignores them.
what it takes to be a us president 1. lots of money, 2. other corrupt politicians endorcing you, 3. the liberal media promoting you. you have those three things you are in.

Get Rhythm, when you got the blues. Johnny Cash

gringoloid says on Jan 30, 2008, 07:33:

Hillarys win in Iowa was the biggest upset in history in American Politics.

She was double digits behind in every poll; even in her own campaigns internal audit she didn't have a chance.

this election is rigged.

billyb says on Jan 30, 2008, 09:11:

Gringoloid writes "Hillarys win in Iowa was the biggest upset in history in American Politics."

It would be rigged, had she won, but since she lost Iowa I don't know what you are talking about. Unless you are talking about New Hampshire? We must keep all these conspiracies straight you know ;0

gringoloid says on Feb 2, 2008, 06:35:

I just saw this now........whenever I clicked on this thread I got, "no such post!". I thought it was deleted for political correctness purposes.

I did New Hampshire first and then Iowa and got them mixed up...sorry.

But the point still stands, Hillary was single digits in the polls in both states and comes out at the top or near the top in the elections.

gringoloid says on Feb 2, 2008, 06:38:

There have been dozens of hearings on the vote fraud as a result of the George Bushs scam in florida.

One man controls the source code for these machnes, John Silvestro.

You can google that name and Diebold Voting Machines and come up with all kinds of evidence that voting democracy is over in the usa.

gringoloid says on Feb 2, 2008, 06:41:

And the idea that everyone here is concerned about "when is LaMona is coming back" on the one hand;....and then everyone complaining about Chávez....

You deserve Chávez!

gringoloid says on Feb 2, 2008, 06:46:

John Silvestro....one man......controls the source code for 81% of the vote in New Hampshire.

slguy says on Feb 2, 2008, 08:47:

Photobucket

Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab