Lcacique has left 4115 comments

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

Mitch, I respect your feelings. While I do not share the level of enthusiasm you have for Uribe, I have no problem with you voicing your support for him and I understand why you would praise him given the changes in your country. I do have concerns about Uribe, but I am not here to bad mouth him and I appreciate that you can admit that he is imperfect. Most importantly, I sincerely love your country and its people and I hope that la tierra querida continues to improve in every aspect. We probably agree on a lot with respect to this issue and I am happy that you are intelligent enough to recognize that while I do not agree with you 100% it doesn't mean that I love the FARC. If at some point my opinion offends you with respect to Colombia - send me an email so that we can discuss it without all of the bs input of some of the posters. I am sure that you will find that my heart is in the right place.

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

Thank you again for proving my point, tasco. Just as I said, you do not have the capacity to debate therefore you immediately employ the tactic I highlighted...this time, throwing out the chavista nonsense. makopp5: I was under the impression that you thought that the FARC should be annihilated, punished or - at the very least - sent away to Venezuela. I wasn't aware that you thought that they should be given amnesty, for the most part. Thanks for the clarification. You are right, it is difficult to punish these groups - especially in countries where the justice system is extremely weak. Still, I am not sure that I agree 100% with you and I am pretty certain that such a statement will lead to certain individuals believing that you are a FARC supporter.

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

No problem, oneforyourmillion.

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

I also want to be clear that I am not accusing Mitch of the behavior that I described. I highly doubt that he would consider the slightest criticism of Uribe to be proof that someone supports the Farc.

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

Freakin' hilarious, right? Weren't my intentions clear? I spelled it out and gave fair warning that I was going to engage in "their" behavior, that I was going to make a false accusation in order to mock "their" tactics and along comes tasco (one of the greatest perpetrators of the tactic in question) swallowing it hook, line and sinker as if it was a sincere comment against people who support Uribe. Thanks, tasco. Any questions about why it is difficult to have a debate with tasco? Simon: I was not being sincere; however, let's assume that I believed such nonsense. Let's also assume that no paramilitary groups existed in Colombia, that the demobilization resulted in a 100% disappearance of such organizations. People who praised Uribe could still be in favor of those groups regardless of whether or not they currently existed. But let me emphasize once again that I was not being serious in that statement.

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

Agreed, Desi, yawn...but let's just flip it for fun and see if the children can learn a lesson. Para-supporters are the only people who downplay the reality of inequality or applaud Uribe.

Lcacique comments on For all you Anti-Uribe Farc loving bloggers!! Here is what your farc boys do for fun.

I assume then, oneforyourmillion, that you are equally upset by the fact that right-wing terrorists who were guilty of more atrocities in the country were largely pardoned for their crimes. Uribe's administration was the recipient of unprecedented levels of aid which enabled Colombia to have greater State presence in remote areas. Under these circumstances - and others attributable to having access to increased funds - it is not surprising that Uribe has had more success than his predecessors. Personally, I have mixed feelings about him. There may be someone on here, romy, that supports the FARC; however, it is much more common for people to be falsely accused of supporting them - most often by a small, loud group of idiots who have nothing else in their arsenal for debates. Before one of these idiots jumps up and claims that my comment is nothing more than communist propaganda from the far left, let me say that it goes both ways. There are people on the left who draw conclusions about Uribe supporters that are equally faulty.

Lcacique comments on FOX " News "............... caught again.

Palin does not appeal to anyone outside of a small segment of her own party. As poor of a choice that McCain was on his own, poll after poll illustrated that Palin increasingly and deservedly became a weight around McCain's neck as the campaign went on. She is a celebrity (hell, they got a pornstar to portray her in adult flicks) so she does draw some crowds, but she has not demonstrated that she has the slightest clue whatsoever about politics. Over and over she has shown that she is incapable of accepting responsibility for anything that she says, flip-flopping like a dying fish. Instead, she places all of the blame on those around her. I giggled when the cons on pbh begged other members to stop speaking the truth about poor Palin (I thought she was a pit bull - turns out she is a pathetic chihuahua), claiming that she was stepping down from office to escape the unfair criticism that she attracted while in the limelight in order to live in peace hidden in the Alaskan wilderness. Yeah right. She is a media whore, starved for fame in fortune. In this country which embraces reality show freaks as if they were noteworthy stars, it is no wonder that she feels deserving of adulation nor is it surprising that her presence on a television screen has brainwashed some into believing that she has talent. Don't get me wrong, I never want her to leave. If she remains in politics. Awesome! If she gets her own show - while I wouldn't bother watching it - great! It would provide excellent material for Stewart and the like. Her book sales are a joke. Newsmax magazine immediately offered it for $8.95 with four free issues of its magazine. Newsmax normally lists at $39.95 for 12 issues or $3.33 an issue. Immediately after making the offer, Newsmax made a second offer: get Palin's book and four free issues for $4.95. What is being offered for free? "So you might wonder why Wal-Mart recently decided to start its own price war, taking on Amazon in the online book market. Wal-Mart began by marking down the prices of ten best-sellers—including the new Stephen King and the upcoming Sarah Palin—to ten bucks. When Amazon, predictably, matched that price, Wal-Mart went to nine dollars, and, when Amazon matched again, Wal-Mart went to $8.99, at which point Amazon rested. (Target, too, jumped in, leading Wal-Mart to drop to $8.98.) Since wholesale book prices are traditionally around fifty per cent off the cover price, and these books are now marked down sixty per cent or more, Amazon and Wal-Mart are surely losing money every time they sell one of the discounted titles. The more they sell, the less they make. That doesn’t sound like good business." Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2009/11/09/091109ta_talk_surowiecki#ixzz0XWL9itR8 And they are offering signed copies for $100. Too funny.

Lcacique comments on FOX " News "............... caught again.

oops, Fox just got busted again for the same tactic - using old footage of a year old McCain/Palin rally in order to make a current Palin book tour event look like it was well attended. http://mediamatters.org/research/200911190043 p.s. Didn't a whole bunch of members here promise that we would never see Palin again when she bailed out of governance?

Lcacique comments on How to Drive a Hummer in Iraq

I was merely informing you that I do not need reassurance. I have a feeling that fastpitch is going to be terribly confused with you being in agreement with me about this matter. Before he draws some faulty conclusions from our correspondence, could you please identify the ideological,religious and/or ethnic makeup of these insurgencies: Euskadi Ta Askatasuna All Tripura Tiger Force National Liberation Front of Tripura Sendero Luminoso Tamil Tigers

Lcacique comments on How to Drive a Hummer in Iraq

vinod, I need no reassurance. You may want to direct your comment at your buddy. He is the one having trouble with the concept.

Lcacique comments on How to Drive a Hummer in Iraq

The two are not mutually exclusive.

Lcacique comments on How to Drive a Hummer in Iraq

No wonder they are considered target practice for insurgents.

Lcacique comments on How low will he go? Obama gives Japan's Emperor Akihito a wow bow

Be careful, whether it is a solution or a hammer, you'll excite teabaggers with that kind of talk billyb.

Lcacique comments on How low will he go? Obama gives Japan's Emperor Akihito a wow bow

So the solution is to cut off China's access to the US market? Interesting. Does that sound like capitalism?

Lcacique comments on FOX " News "............... caught again.

Fox lied about the footage when it originally aired. Then, Hannity lies a second time in his apology when he said it was a mistake.

Lcacique comments on How low will he go? Obama gives Japan's Emperor Akihito a wow bow

Did he vomit on the prime minister? They are still laughing about that today. I believe they use Bush's name to refer to any situation where one person throws up on another person. Classy.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

Why would I waste my time answering your questions? Do you intend to listen with an open mind? Absolutely not. You have already demonstrated that over and over. You just want to slam all Muslims and pretend that I am apologizing for the terrorists because I do not tag along and damn all Muslims. I do not have to apologize for Muslims and I will not apologize for terrorists - the two are not synonymous. Who publishes Spencer's books? A University press? A publisher with a political agenda? Are they reviewed in academic journals? Does he have a degree in Islamic studies? Are there scholars who disagree with Spencer? What do they say? Have you investigated their points to see if they have merit or do you simply ignore them because they contradict what you already believe?

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

It does not take a spine to engage in sweeping generalizations over the internet, vinod. What a brave man you are battling the Muslims on a Colombian forum. fastpitch, I think it is time that you were demoted to slowpitch. Better yet, tee ball. All over that heavenly book that you worship, the Christian God is described as "the light." What an embarrassing conundrum for the Christians who invented Satan. God is light, Satan is light: That's a big "oops." What happens if you do not submit to God? Oh yeah, you go to hell. The Christian God is loving? Only if you love him more than anything else including your family. Clearly, God was created in the image of g_s, who is equally as desperate and in need of affection. And your loving Jesus is going to do what in the End Times? He is going to lovingly slaughter anyone who doesn't accept him as their savior. What a swell guy! Why in the hell would I read someone famous for manipulating evidence and/or ignoring it so as to promote a distorted view of Islam? I am all for reading criticism of the religion and its followers, but I do want it to be based in fact.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

vinod, I see no point in judging an entire group of people based on the actions of a few within the group. I also try to stay away from making sweeping generalizations.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

Acknowledging common traits between two separate entities is not the same as equating them. I do not recall saying that one group is better or worse than the other. It's kind of ironic that you have constantly been equating historical events, making all kinds of comparisons, and justifying acts based on the actions of other groups, yet you accuse me of doing so.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

The thread has been deleted. He responded to a video of a black woman saying that she would never have to pay for gas again now that Obama was president. The woman's comment was ridiculous. So what? The context: the video and how blacks were reacting to Obama's win. Do you need any more assistance? I have to be original? I can't point out your hypocrisy with your own words? Is that a rule? I never equated one thing to another. That is simply your flawed interpretation of what I wrote. Of course I care about Hindus that have been slaughtered by Muslims (and I know enough about the conflict there). I never gave the slightest hint otherwise. It does not mean that I forgive those Hindus who kill innocent Muslims - of course, you do not believe in such a concept because all Muslims are evil in your eyes.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

"Hard to believe the stupidity of these morons. It is as if they are only a few years from swinging from trees!" ~ aztec The comment was made in reference to an African American woman who made a ridiculous comment. aztec has never attempted to clarify what he meant by the statement; therefore, one can assume that he was comparing blacks to monkeys. You, on the other hand, do not appear to be racist - though you could be. You clearly hate the followers of a religion, which is pathetic in its own right. But I see no point in mentioning it as you freely admit your hatred. Why would I care about how Islam views slavery? Good luck with your attempts at exculpatory cultural relevance.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

Despite his quote about blacks just being a few years from the days when they were swinging from the trees, aztec still has not admitted he is a racist.

Lcacique comments on Rush gets punked...

Agreed. I have a problem with some of his ideas, but not his right to speak.

Lcacique comments on Rush gets punked...

I don't know that he keeps the liberals in check - he gives them ammo, in my opinion. I think he does a better job pushing conservatives away from the middle and farther to the right. Over and over they have apologized to Rush, adopting his far-right position on the issues.

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/On_Eid_bands_against_terror/articleshow/3815902.cms http://www.gracecathedral.org/enrichment/reflections/ref_20050712.shtml

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

What does my comment have to do with political correctness and where have I tried to clear someone who was guilty?

Lcacique comments on Hijacked Again. "The Religion of Peace" according to delusional state-run media.

In the wise words of Perry Farrell, "you know the man you hate, you look more like him day by day." The Christian God also preaches murder to the infidels. Read about Joshua. Or the End Times. I love that all of these Christians are collecting funds to send Jews back to Israel as if they are doing them a favor. In reality, they believe that the Jews have to be in Israel for Jesus to come back in order to murder all of the non-believers. The Christian God is so benevolent, my ass. Have fun going in circles.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

What guy in India? The second paragraph clearly states that the seminar contained people from the international community, including individuals from Libya, Egypt, Morocco, Syria and Jordan. These individuals traveled from their homeland in order to criticize the terrorist attack in India. I am not sure how you missed that nor do I understand how you came to the conclusion that it was the voice of a single Indian. I do not follow the logic of your statement about how one should not expect honesty from a Muslim in India due to the fact that Muslims are guilty of a heinous crime there. In other words, an American should not be taken seriously if he/she disagrees with the crimes that were committed against the Native Americans. You seem to be arguing that it would be necessary to find some anglos abroad to apologize for the crime in order for it to be genuine. I would not base my opinion about a religious text on the word of one individual. The fact that there are all kinds of interpretations should tell you that there is disagreement. If you want to accept the word of your friend as the only correct interpretation of the Koran, have at it.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

I do not have time to counter all of your points. I will leave it up to you, because there are sources of information out there in the www where you can find Muslim scholars criticizing Muslim terrorists. Here is one from the Times of India website: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Muslim-scholars-declare-jihad-against-terrorism/articleshow/4921318.cms

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

I agree about the types of leaders that many of these countries have had; however, the same can be said of many underdeveloped countries in terms of having oppressive regimes regardless of the dominant religion found there. Most Muslim scholars disagree with the radical interpretations of the Koran. I seem to recall leaders stepping up and criticizing 9/11, but you are right: it would be nice if Muslim voices of opposition to such crimes were louder and more frequent (but are Christian voices of opposition very loud or frequent with respect to Bush using Christian terms over and over in our war against Iraq?). Sure, Jesus was a nice little hippy but the Bible also includes a God that murders the first-born children in Egypt, a God that orders Abraham to murder his son, a God that murders his own son, a God that orders Joshua to slaughter all of the Amalekites, and of course you have Leviticus with its eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth teachings, etc etc etc... I am too tired to keep going with all of this, but know that I agree with many of your points to one degree or another.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

It is my understanding, rocco, that the Vatican requires that the priests have secret files and this - at least in part - protects the perps of molestation. In addition, orders for covering up such crimes came directly from the Vatican. The Vatican's position was to deceive the public in order to protect pedophiles. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/06/eveningnews/main566978.shtml I simply think that both you and vinod (though I understand vinod's hostility toward the group in question) are quick to generalize and demonize an entire group of people based on the actions of a minority. I think some people are too quick to blast all Muslims. You argue that religion probably does not play a role in non-Muslim extremist groups despite the fact that they include it as part of their manifesto - you may be right. But one could also argue that other things (land, access to vital resources, lack of opportunities, etc) are the driving force behind the acts of Muslim groups - to varying degrees. To assume that all Muslims agree with the actions of the various extremist groups and talk as if they all fit nicely into one category is wrong in my opinion.

Lcacique comments on Next trip to Colomiba, remind me to pick up a few pairs of gaitas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MElPAcn1YJA

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

I don't disagree with you that the Church has an unrealistic concept of human behavior in terms of sexuality; however, I do think that they encourage behavior that results in one person causing the death of another based on this faulty vision of human existence. It is fine for them to say that they would prefer that people practice monogamy and only engage in sex with their spouse - that is great; nevertheless, their positive intentions (assuming they are positive) are no excuse for the consequences of their demands. We can also discuss their preference to protect the perpetrators of molestation as oppose to the victims. And as vinod notes, Christians haven't behaved well in India. There are extremist groups that have been known to forcibly convert people to Christianity. There are several Russian paramilitary organizations that include Russian Orthodoxy as part of their credo. I believe Africa also has terrorist Christian groups. In highlighting these things, I have never argued that it lessens the evils committed by other groups with different beliefs. I do not know the current status for contractors in Iraq, but they should be treated the same way we would treat a foreigner guilty of criminal activity on our soil. Here is an article from a year ago that discusses how the status may change soon: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1712938,00.html I know that contractors also operated with immunity in Colombia as well, but that also may have changed recently. I am not a fan of anyone being tortured or killed, but I must admit that I have little sympathy for military contractors.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

Being a for profit organization does not mean that there are no other motivations to doing the work and those motives may change job to job. I am sure that you are familiar with the sect of Christians who are actively trying to bring about the End Times. Well, some of them are in positions of power. Overall, however, as I noted, I am not sure how sincere some of them are in terms of their beliefs. Many may be simply using religious language in order to deceive Christians in to supporting a money-making scheme. I am very aware that there are 100s of contractors all over the world who do similar jobs. I have not heard of any cases where the management has claimed that they want to go to war with the Muslim world. Still, if they operate with immunity, I completely disagree with them operating anywhere. With the Catholic condom issue, I agree. It is on the individual. If they are silly enough to believe in such things then it is their own fault; still, I see no contradiction in the blaming the Church sharing the blame for threatening ignorant people with Hell while encouraging their followers to commit one of the greatest sins: murder. And, in my mind, the Church is an accomplice to the crime.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

I did not bring up the Klan, that was vinod. Did I claim that Muslim terrorism was acceptable because terrorism exists in other cultures? It wasn't my intention. Bush supposedly is a Christian. He promoted the Iraq war as a crusade. Did he believe this or was it simply a means of whipping up support for an unnecessary war? Christianity, in one way or another, is still behind violent acts regardless of whether or not the perpetrator is in a cave or a White House. According to investigations, the leader of Blackwater is also a huge supporter of the idea that his organization is taking part in a Christian Crusade. The Pope tells individuals with Aids that they will go to Hell if they attempt to protect the life of their partner by wearing a condom and I would argue that the Catholic church is responsible for the consequences - in many cases it is death. Wouldn't that be considered backwards and archaic?

Lcacique comments on babygirl

Glad you had a good time. Props for the Trujillo photo.

Lcacique comments on Take off eh!

Oh how I loved SCTV. So much so that me and friend dressed up as Bob and Doug for Halloween years ago. And Kids in the Hall were huge for me, enjoyed them much more than the American counterpart. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA3WxjplKzo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojKWw77Az2s

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

I didn't mean to make you feel ashamed about the actions of extremists from India. Still, I know how you feel. The actions of the US government have made me feel embarrassed more than once and hateful crackers like bam m increase that embarrassment exponentially. Yet, I would never blame you for the actions of a few extremists that happen to have the same ethnic heritage as you and I would hope that you would not judge me for the actions of my government or the behavior of certain individuals who happen to have the same skin tone as me. Haven't the Christians slaughtered millions of people? Aren't they expansionist? I also find it interesting that you have no problem with extremist groups killing within their own borders. The KKK is fine as long as they do not move to India. If this is the case, why do you care if Hindus are killing Christians within India?

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

You do not have to invade another country in order to be labeled an extremist. Neo-nazi's are extremists in the US and they have no desire -as far as I know - to invade foreign countries. The fact that they are not expansionist does not change the fact that they are an extremist organization. I was not comparing Hindu extremists to Muslim extremists. I was just noting that Hindu extremism was under-reported in the States. Also, while India is for the most part very tolerant of a variety of religions, I was also noting that it isn't a bowl of cherries. I certainly would not want to be a Christian in certain areas of the country where the groups listed above were active. "The news comes after an upsurge in violence that has seen Hindu mobs rampage through Christian villages in the eastern Indian state of Orissa, leaving more than 40 people dead. More than 20,000 Christians in the district of Kandhamal fled their homes for state-run camps. Christians who have lost their homes have been told they can return only if they convert to Hinduism." http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/25/india-hindu-ramadan-bharatiya-janata "When violence boils up in Orissa, it can be horrific. In 1999, an Australian missionary who ran a medical clinic was burned alive -- along with his two children -- by a Hindu mob. The latest troubles began after the Aug. 24 slaying of a hard-line Hindu leader, Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati, who had become known for advocating the reconversion of Hindu villagers who convert to Christianity. Police blamed atheistic Maoist extremists for the killing, but right-wing Hindu groups blamed Christians and set fire to a Christian orphanage. That has been followed by mob attacks on churches as well as shops and homes owned by Christian. At least 28 people have been killed." http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2008-10-01-504329397_x.htm There haven't been tens of thousands of Christians slaughtered for not converting to Hinduism, yet many have been forced to convert or flee: "...Christian families like the Digals say they are being forced to abandon their faith in exchange for their safety. The forced conversions come amid widening attacks on Christians here and in at least five other states across the country, as India prepares for national elections next spring. The clash of faiths has cut a wide swath of panic and destruction through these once quiet hamlets fed by paddy fields and jackfruit trees. Here in Kandhamal, the district that has seen the greatest violence, more than 30 people have been killed, 3,000 homes burned and over 130 churches destroyed, including the tin-roofed Baptist prayer hall where the Digals worshiped." http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/world/asia/13india.html “'This has been a religious genocide according to the U-N definition of genocide, where persistently and systematically it is planned and not stopped,' maintains Ramesh Landge, founder and director of Cooperative Outreach of India (COI), according to Mission Network News." http://www.christianpost.com/article/20081104/persecution-in-india-is-religious-genocide-says-ministry/index.html If I was a Christian, should I come to the conclusion that Hindu's were evil? Should I make generalized comments damming India since Hinduism is so prevalent there? And haven't the Sikh's also been targeted? I seem to remember a false flag operation in the 80's where India's military attacked Sikh's and tried to blame it on Muslims. Why are you bringing up the KKK, the CIA, and the Vatican with respect to Mumbai? They weren't involved there; therefore, all of their crimes are forgiven and forgotten?

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

Yes, c-dawg. In addition, we often dismiss anything that contradicts our previously held belief as unimportant, uncommon, or unbelievable. I rarely hear pro-Muslim accounts in the media, but I hear a lot of negative stories - some deserved, some generalized exaggerations. vinod: I know that you recognize that your country is imperfect, but I was wondering if you have any insight as to why Hindu extremist groups are so unknown in the states. Ask the typical American if he/she has heard of Hindu extremists like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the Abhinav Bharat, the Rashtriya Jagran Manch, the Sri Ram Sene, the Hindu Dharam Sena, or the Sanatan Sanstha and I would bet that the answer would be "no." Yet, there is a growing militancy amongst these groups which are bent on Hindu supremacy.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

Huge oversimplification - in my opinion - about the media being blind to crimes committed by Muslims against Christians. You see what you want to see.

Lcacique comments on vote with a bullet

Yes! The people should rise up and topple the corrupt government. Of course, they will become corrupt and we can start the process over again. A revolving door at the White House would be awesome: people go in, bodies come out.

Lcacique comments on onthemoon

Thanks for the add. I haven't bought the CD yet, maybe this weekend. If ever you want to suggest some artists that you like, I love getting introduced to new music. abrazos...

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

What really matters, rocco?

Lcacique comments on Conservatives Unite

We will disagree to disagree then, vinod. I am not accusing you of the behavior described above, but I totally disagree that Conservatives only attack the message.

Lcacique comments on babygirl

Are you still recovering? What in the hell...no report? I am waiting...

Lcacique comments on Conservatives Unite

"I do really get sick of so many on here who resort to insults and attacks at the mere mention of an even semi Conservative Viewpoint. JB is right, it seems that no matter how much sense something may make, you get someone calling you a "nazi" or an imperialist etc. simply because you are an American who maybe doesn't love Obama or criticizes Chavez. It's just Ironic how some of the more conservative members on this board are constantly accused of bieng ingorant and biased, while just as much of the pre-judgding and ignorance is coming from their accusers." I am not keeping score, Rocco; however, I tend to believe that the knee-jerk overreactions and personal attacks are - at the very least - equally as common on the other side of the fence. Say one positive thing about Obama and all of the sudden he is your messiah and/or you are a Stalinist. Say one bad thing about Uribe and you are pro-FARC. I am not telling you anything that you do not already know.

Lcacique comments on If Obama Had Told Us Before His Election

how pathetic