<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google gives in to the dark side.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2007/12/15/3973/google-gives-in-to-the-dark-side/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2007/12/15/3973/google-gives-in-to-the-dark-side</link>
	<description>Peter Van Dijck's weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: elise</title>
		<link>http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2007/12/15/3973/google-gives-in-to-the-dark-side#comment-143254</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2007/12/15/3973/google-gives-in-to-the-dark-side#comment-143254</guid>
		<description>i wouldn't say Dark Side, just the side of profit.  Companies exist in an universe where moral principles don't apply, it's profitable or it's not.  Google is an advertising company.
But there are some interesting initiatives out there for search, hope we'll get some good alternative soon (True Knowledge for instance).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldn&#8217;t say Dark Side, just the side of profit.  Companies exist in an universe where moral principles don&#8217;t apply, it&#8217;s profitable or it&#8217;s not.  Google is an advertising company.<br />
But there are some interesting initiatives out there for search, hope we&#8217;ll get some good alternative soon (True Knowledge for instance).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
