Why you need 50000 songs, not 500
the weblog of Lucas Gonze: “I remember times in my life where I had a strictly limited music collection, and I kept things fresh by listening at finer and finer levels of detail. Those days should be over for most of us, though. It’s important for individuals to grow their collections past the “enough” marker, whether that’s 50,000 songs or even just 500, because at that point you stop listening in the old way.
The new way is to treat music more like a newspaper than a book, so that a continuous stream of fresh content is intrinsic to the media. If you hear a good hook somewhere, the next day you should find that hook remixed into another song. You should never again, post 20th century, post the era when music and manufactured goods were synonomous, think of music as something so static that 500 songs could encompass it.”
Interesting. I always have fun with calling stuff “the X of Y”. So this is the psychology of abundance? :)
October 29th, 2006 at 6:44 pm
Quality is over-rated.
October 30th, 2006 at 7:52 am
A little offtopic, in reference to your http://iasearch.net/...
In The Stromboli Project we´ve prepaired a Google Customize Search Directory:
http://thestromboliproject.com/verticalsearch/
We have submit your Google Co-op development iasearch to http://thestromboliproject.com/verticalsearch/Computers/Information_architecture/
Cheers!
;)
November 14th, 2006 at 9:47 am
Pandora is nice, it suggests music that is like songs you suggest or rate. It quite accurately finds out your music taste. (pandora.com)