http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2005/11/10/2911/2911 Peter Van Dijck's weblog Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:04:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2005/11/10/2911/2911#comment-46787 Peter Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:59:47 +0000 http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2005/11/10/2911/2911#comment-46787 I figure we can merge faceted systems and folksonomies. But if I define a facet, and the users use it in a different way, then what des the metadata mean? What I defined, or how the users used it? I figure we can merge faceted systems and folksonomies. But if I define a facet, and the users use it in a different way, then what des the metadata mean? What I defined, or how the users used it?

]]> http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2005/11/10/2911/2911#comment-46775 Enzo Cesanelli Fri, 11 Nov 2005 09:25:09 +0000 http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/archives/2005/11/10/2911/2911#comment-46775 It could be true... but what about faceted classification? I mean the f.c. is an a priori system (first the facets are defined by some information architect or librarian, then they can be used by users) and maybe is not compatible with a folksonomy system... what do you think about it? It could be true… but what about faceted classification? I mean the f.c. is an a priori system (first the facets are defined by some information architect or librarian, then they can be used by users) and maybe is not compatible with a folksonomy system… what do you think about it?

]]>