Does anyone else here feel like I do that the design here is poorly thought out?
I thought the other design was lacking-well it was-but this one is barely an improvement in terms of functionality.
It 'looks' better but is still IMO a long way from being user friendly and not nearly as effective as it could be.
What's the point of having clearly defined Forums for different subjects when all 'best' new entries end up on an amorphous 'Main Page' yet a person must return to the aforesaid Forums to enter a new topic?
WTF is that?
What are the classifications for then?
WTF decides what's 'best' and what isn't and how much time does that take?
Maybe the time taken by someone deciding what posts are 'best' and what aren't could be spent fixing the lack of a functional cookie process so I don't have to login every time I switch windows-over&over&over&over.
BASTA!!!!!!
Peter-Thanks for everything but unless this improves I'm outta here-confusion and flakiness in design are in no way conducive to open and fair exchange of views/info.
By Sam Salmon on Dec 18, 2004, 22:08 in Friendly Talkzone.
|
adrimm says on Dec 19, 2004, 00:03: Geeez It's not like you are paying to access the site or someone is forcing you to use it. If you've got the time, energy and resources to set something better up go for it, I'll take a look.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
Miguel says on Dec 19, 2004, 01:52: Senor Sam What do you mean by having to log on several times? I log in once and that is it. I find this new format mas facil. Don' leave, Sam, because in my opinion you make some great posts.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
viewpoint says on Dec 19, 2004, 04:01: Unsatisfied Sam de Salmon,
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
santiBOG says on Dec 19, 2004, 05:09: .... but he does have a point about the cookies. I agree that his complaints should have had better wording. However, it is true what he said about the login/cookie process. I find myself having to log back in only after a short period of inactivity (a few minutes).
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
viewpoint says on Dec 19, 2004, 05:44: santiBOG Well I guess it's not a problem for me because I only log on to make a post and before posting I copy the post from my edit tap just in case I log out due to time constraints. Peter created this site in 1998 (I believe) and has maintained it for the past six years and I am sure that he knows the few issues of inconvence without being criticised publicly. The improvements to the site come on a regular basis and the few remaining issues will come in their own time thanks to him having the interest and committment to give us this website to use.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
YEP says on Dec 19, 2004, 06:21: Ehm the cookie problem ------------------------------------------------------------------- Just another scandinavian getting ready to explore South America 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
2retirensa says on Dec 19, 2004, 09:02: Nothing in life is perfect! Get over it.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
santiBOG says on Dec 19, 2004, 09:03: Beg to differ gringoinbogota I am sure Peter appreciates well-meaning suggestions from users. After all, isn't that what this forum is all about... discussion, interaction?
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
Sam Salmon says on Dec 19, 2004, 11:14: I admit to being 'half cut' w I admit to being 'half cut' when I posted this but I stand by waht I said-as caustic as it is. ' a la orden!' 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
YEP says on Dec 19, 2004, 11:55: Sam ... then I'd suggest that you jump in and offer your help with the coding that has to take place to the standard setup that Peter uses. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Just another scandinavian getting ready to explore South America 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
Gomezman5 says on Dec 19, 2004, 13:33: I think the site is FINE but a positve suggestion I will agree with what at least three people have already written.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
isaactraveler says on Dec 19, 2004, 14:45: hahah you slow-ass-typers!! just kidding.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
santiBOG says on Dec 19, 2004, 15:35: Reply to Gomezman5 I like your idea about the pop-up window but it would probably be better to have a session cookie (expires when you shut down your browser). What do you think Peter?
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
YEP says on Dec 19, 2004, 15:42: at SantiBug ------------------------------------------------------------------- Just another scandinavian getting ready to explore South America 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
Peter (Moderator) says on Dec 19, 2004, 18:15: Yes, the cookie problem drives me crazy as well. And I don't mind feedback like this, I think it's great! Anyways, about the cookie thing... mmm... I'm getting hungry now. It's a known problem with Drupal (the open source platform this site runs on). I didn't realize it was that bad (I never get logged out until I close my browser window). I have tried to fix it but no success so far. I am considering actually paying one of the Drupal developers to do it, and to add a "remember me" checkbox. Poor but snappy 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
ACBlessing says on Dec 19, 2004, 18:19: Bad cookie, bad cookie I echo everyone who is thankful for a free place to hang out and chat so thank you Peter. Yes, the cookie monster bit me once when I typed a three-page response to help someone but couldn't post because I had been timed out. When I hit the back button, I lost an hour's worth of work. Just plain poor 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
mark says on Dec 19, 2004, 23:33: sound like a democrat crying over the election eom..
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
YEP says on Dec 20, 2004, 02:28: Well mark I can second ACB's experience .... It's a royal pain in the a..... when you just typed a very looooooooong reply and this happens :-/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Just another scandinavian getting ready to explore South America 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
YEP says on Dec 20, 2004, 02:32: at Peter ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Just another scandinavian getting ready to explore South America 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
dwmte says on Dec 20, 2004, 14:34: the site's great peter................. as far as constructive suggestions go.
0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
YEP says on Dec 20, 2004, 15:03: Another suggestion ------------------------------------------------------------------- Just another scandinavian getting ready to explore South America 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
|
ARMacleod says on Dec 20, 2004, 15:36: No complaints Peter. Lets see if I can get this one in before I lose the thread and the will to live. I have the solution however, I write this in WP8 or Word, cut and paste and in the few times that I have been ‘outed' my two finger typing has managed to retype my name in about 10 seconds. A truly wonderful thing this modern invention and innovation, and for my good friend Mr D Negro, spell check and thesaurus is included at no extra cost. The brain is like a parachute, it only functions correctly when it is open. Pax vobiscum. 0 funny, 0 helpful. |
More posts by the same author:
Remember When the NYSE Visited FARC? 2
Carlos Castaño is Dead-Has Been For Some time Now 11
Another Kick in The Cojones for FARC 50
My Favourite Place in Cartagena-Maybe Yours Too! 6
Article on Anti-FARC Ecuadoran Army Patrol 2
Acupuncture-Effective Treatment for Hostage Trauma 3
FARC Lies Have Started-To Be Expected 5
Bloodbath to Come?....Could Be! 1
Brasil Knows How To Welcome FARC! 0
The French Just Don't Get It-Not At All 24
French Slink Home Tails Between Their Legs 22
Released Hostage's First Moments on Video 4
Guardian Article on Venesolano Complicity w/FARC 2
Dead is Good=Wilber Varela Drug Lord Shot Dead in Merida, Venezuela 7
Americas: |
Africa: |
Asia:
|
Travel: Also: |
If you're not a part of this travelicious experiment just yet, just sign up here. It's free & easy.
About poorbuthappy | About the travel guides | Travel guide editing | Community rules | RSS feeds
© 1998 - 2008 Peter Van Dijck, all rights reserved.