| pbh home > > post |
Join in 7 seconds.. Existing users: sign in.
![]() |
all forums, active | friendly talkzone, travel tips, visa & paperwork, renting, selling & meetups, politics & the war, espanol
Colombian authorities have came out saying that other countries should not be negotiating with the FARC for hostage release without consent from Colombia. In a sense I agree with this because just like I expected sovereignty of Ecuador to be respected, more so I care for Colombia's sovereignty. However, Colombia should allow these processes to proceed as the hostages need to be released.
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90852/6412360.html
Colombia rejects other countries' arrangements to free hostages
The Colombian government Thursday rejected other country’s arrangements made in a bid to seek the release of hostages held by the rebel group, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).
It is "unacceptable" that other governments seek or make contacts with FARC without Colombia's authorization, Foreign Minister Fernando Araujo said.
"The international community is aware of FARC's terrorist actions, and the damage they has done and how they hide in other countries", Araujo said.
Araujo said he regretted the announcement of Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa that he would seek the liberation of FARC's hostages.
"Any kind of activity with FARC must be done with Colombia's authorization. It is unacceptable that any person comes to make unauthorized arrangements because these are inconvenient for our security," Araujo insisted.
Correa has said he would seek for the liberation of former Colombian presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt, who was kidnapped by FARC in 2002.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez also said he would try to re-establish contacts with the FARC rebels in an attempt to free more hostages.
Betancourt's family regretted Araujo's declaration and they affirmed that Ecuador's arrangements have humanitarian aims.
FARC has offered the exchange of 45 hostages for the release of 500 jailed guerillas. The Colombian government rejected the proposal.
Source:Xinhua
By romy on May 16, 2008, 08:59 in Politics & the war.
|
tomtom33 says on May 16, 2008, 09:26: No, the only reason that the hostages were taken in the first place is that some people will pay in one way or another for their release. If everyone refused to pay anything for any hostage release, there would be no more hostage-taking.
|
|
romy says on May 16, 2008, 09:29: "If everyone refused to pay anything for any hostage release, there would be no more hostage-taking" that's not entirely true, in a sense quite a few of the hostages could be seen as prisoners of war.
|
|
|
slguy says on May 16, 2008, 09:37: prisoners of war? Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab |
|
billyb says on May 16, 2008, 09:48: I could see the soldiers captured in battle as POWs, but any civilian is a just a hostage and victim of terrorism.
|
|
slguy says on May 16, 2008, 09:58: hmmmmm....does that mean we should begin expecting FARC to at least read the geneva conventions? Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab |
|
billyb says on May 16, 2008, 10:44: "hmmmmm....does that mean we should begin expecting FARC to at least read the geneva conventions?"
|
|
CatGirl says on May 16, 2008, 12:08: Either the picture that we are getting via media is warped and we are all missing many peices to a convoluted puzzle and/or Hugo is a loose cannon....it appears he definitely enjoys dancing to the beat of his own drum. Love and Time: the only two things that cannot be bought, but only spent |
|
slguy says on May 16, 2008, 12:12: cg, my favorite columnist consistently refers to "venezuela's narcissist leninist leader". Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab |
|
buggy says on May 16, 2008, 15:38: "prisoners of war? “Ojos y oídos para Norteamérica / para su propio pueblo, sordo y ciego" Pablo Neruda |
|
buggy says on May 16, 2008, 15:39: "i also don't see our troops today, injured or killed in iraq, as casualties of war, but as victims of terrorism." “Ojos y oídos para Norteamérica / para su propio pueblo, sordo y ciego" Pablo Neruda |
|
buggy says on May 16, 2008, 15:41: Why have you deleted the big red nose of slguy? It is not a personal attack. It is a politic argument against one payaso. “Ojos y oídos para Norteamérica / para su propio pueblo, sordo y ciego" Pablo Neruda |
|
slguy says on May 16, 2008, 16:10: oh come on, cassini! you can do better than those feeble attempts, can't you? Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab |
|
|
CatGirl says on May 16, 2008, 18:04: SlguyÑ Puuuufecto description. Short, sweet and to the point Love and Time: the only two things that cannot be bought, but only spent |
More posts by the same author:
Uribe's Popularity at a Record High- 91.42% 8
Who was worse for Colombia, Tirofijo or Pablo Escobar? 10
Colombian Head Chef at Calgary Hot Spot 7
Harold and Kumar- Escape from Guantanamo 3
Corruptos from 3 countries and a football pitch 1
Juanes negociaría con la guerrilla si fuera presidente 54
36 Hours in Cartagena, Colombia 4
Colombia investigates foreigners for alleged rebel ties 3
La Mejor Seleccion Colombia de Todos Los Tiempos- Top Colombian National Team of All-time (Footy) 9
Chavez- Is there reason for the paranoia? 25
On Democracy in Colombia... "Mark Him on the Ballot - The One Wearing Glasses" 6
La Rumba Express: bachelorette parties on a Colombian 'chiva' 8
13 cocaine labs destroyed in Colombia 9
Supreme court rules that music downloading is legal in Colombia 14
Americas: |
Africa: |
Asia:
|
Travel: Also: |
If you're not a part of this travelicious experiment just yet, just sign up here. It's free & easy.
About poorbuthappy | About the travel guides | Travel guide editing | Community rules
© 1998 - 2008 Peter Van Dijck, all rights reserved.