PBH / colombia (active forums more | travelguide | pictures) / post

 

Do As I Say, Not As I Do…….??????

Since Illegal Immigration in the US is such a hot political potato, and emotions run wild on all sides, it occurred to me that many people of the US appear to subscribe to the doctrine of “Do As I Say, Not As I Do” with regards to respect of the immigration laws of a country. The respect of the immigration laws of a country, or lack thereof, is a central theme of the current immigration debate. Some are quick to point out that when the current illegal immigrants violate the US immigration laws by entering the country illegally, overstaying their visa, etc, they become criminals and should be pursued for deportation. But what of the US citizens who “immigrate” to Colombia, and violate the immigration laws of Colombia? How many posts have occurred here on PBH where foreigners in Colombia request information on ways to violate Colombian immigration laws by overstaying their visas, finding employment when not authorized by their visa conditions, etc? Does this not also show the same disrespect to Colombian immigration laws? And should this also lead to pursuing these “criminals” and their subsequent deportation?

I am not proposing wholesale deportation of foreigners who violate the laws of Colombia, so current PBHers living in Colombia should not get offended. =) I am interested in reading PBHer’s intelligent views (read non-racist or based on bigotry) on this apparent hypocrisy…

Time to watch USC beat Michigan in the Rose Bowl!!!!!

By Miguel_Clavo on Jan 1, 2007, 12:02 in Politics & the war. AddThis Social Bookmark Button


jay1234 says on Jan 1, 2007, 15:51:

I agree... Very hypocritical to complain about the "illegal immigrant" problem here in the US, and then flout the laws of Colombia. I suspect that some probably feel, "I am a gringo, I bring money to Colombia, so it is not BAD illegal immigration- it's good!"
All that aside, if you followed my posts on UC's thread about his visiting in-laws, you will see that I don't think illegal immigration is that much of a problem. I think our policies are a problem and that they cause problems, but not the presence of immigrants by themselves, any more than the presence of more citizens (really, a question of is there an over-population problem). Poverty and a screwed up system of taxation, especially in regard to the wealthy are bigger problems, IMHO.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 1, 2007, 17:12:

Point well taken Miguel.... and if an individual is in another country, the least they can do is to respect the law of the land, including laws pertaining to immigration. I find it so interesting that many that subscribe to an amnesty for illegal aliens are in reality aligning themselves with businesses that circumvent immigration laws by paying subsistence wages and providing no benefits. Whenever I hear our President say that "they are here to do the jobs that Americans will not do"....I honestly want to puke. Just curious, can anyone here name some jobs "that Americans will not do"...? Meat processors, landscapers, homebuilders get a labor force that can easily be screwed and in turn take jobs away from the unemployed in this country. Taxpayers are given the shaft by having to subsidize services for this illegal population...and if you disagree with me, then I would be more than happy to let you pay my property taxes for 2007. Please feel free to put your money where your mouth is. Personally, I would rather pay more for goods and services knowing that it was produced by a legal workforce.

So let's see.....it truly doesn't stop with just being illegal...to work you need a SS number. It's becoming evident that identity theft is an easy route to obtaining that number. In the recent immigration sweep of Swift Co., many of the individuals had stolen SS numbers; try to get THAT ID theft straightened out with the IRS...! You have to drive to get to work, which requires insurance...well, if I'm here illegally I don't need it. A license to drive and a tag....forget it. And a DUI that maims or kills someone???....if I can get away from the scene of the accident, then I can rapidly make my way back to where I originated from with absolutely no repercussions.

And for those individuals from the US that have overstayed visas or are working illegally in other countries? Shame on you, you should have much more respect for the laws of those countries that have been hospitable enough to allow you to enter in the first place...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 1, 2007, 17:17:

Point well taken Miguel.... and if an individual is in another country, the least they can do is to respect the law of the land, including laws pertaining to immigration. I find it so interesting that many that subscribe to an amnesty for illegal aliens are in reality aligning themselves with businesses that circumvent immigration laws by paying subsistence wages and providing no benefits. Whenever I hear our President say that "they are here to do the jobs that Americans will not do"....I honestly want to puke. Just curious, can anyone here name some jobs "that Americans will not do"...? Meat processors, landscapers, homebuilders get a labor force that can easily be screwed and in turn take jobs away from the unemployed in this country. Taxpayers are given the shaft by having to subsidize services for this illegal population...and if you disagree with me, then I would be more than happy to let you pay my property taxes for 2007. Please feel free to put your money where your mouth is. Personally, I would rather pay more for goods and services knowing that it was produced by a legal workforce.

So let's see.....it truly doesn't stop with just being illegal...to work you need a SS number. It's becoming evident that identity theft is an easy route to obtaining that number. In the recent immigration sweep of Swift Co., many of the individuals had stolen SS numbers; try to get THAT ID theft straightened out with the IRS...! You have to drive to get to work, which requires insurance...well, if I'm here illegally I don't need it. A license to drive and a tag....forget it. And a DUI that maims or kills someone???....if I can get away from the scene of the accident, then I can rapidly make my way back to where I originated from with absolutely no repercussions.

And for those individuals from the US that have overstayed visas or are working illegally in other countries? Shame on you, you should have much more respect for the laws of those countries that have been hospitable enough to allow you to enter in the first place...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 1, 2007, 18:04:

Miguel_Clavo: "violate the immigration laws of Colombia? " But what of the US citizens who “immigrate” to Colombia, and violate the immigration laws of Colombia?

Deport them or put them in prison! If they break the Colombian law on immigration forbid their returning to Colombia.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Robert Jorge says on Jan 1, 2007, 20:37:

I agree with Don Gringo. I get the point of the OP, and it is hypocritical, but the people overstaying visas in Colombia are generally NOT a charge to the Colombian government. They are spending money into the system, not sending it away to another land ... besides perhaps the narcotrafficantes, but that is a whole different topic. If one stays in Colombia an extra month, they are fined at the port of exit. Period. I don't see too many people asking how to stay "illegally" in Colombia here. I see people asking how to stay legally. The red tape for an extended stay in Colombia is the thing that makes it an issue. It is pretty hard to stay in Colombia past 6 months, "legally". That is why so many people ask what it takes to stay longer.

BEWARE of gold diggers.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Robert Jorge says on Jan 1, 2007, 20:41:

I just read my post, and I need to clarify that: What the O.P. Miguel said is not hypocritical: but rather I am agreeing that the people who bitch about illegals in the US, and then want to stay in Colombia past their visa, or disrespect Colombian law, are hypocrites. What I wrote in my above post appears to say I am calling Miguel a hypoctrite, and I didn't mean that.

BEWARE of gold diggers.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 2, 2007, 03:50:

In Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital Spent over $500,000,000 Million(thats right $500 Million)in 2005 on un-reimbursed Healthcare. Not all was spent on undocumented Aliens but a Lot was. We have close to 600,000 uninsured aliens here in Miami Dade County Florida and most of these uninsured Aliens end up going to Jackson Memorial Hospital for Health care. It would be intersting to know the overall cost of the Charity Healthcare spent in Miami alone.Not to mention the folks who drive without Car Insurance and the Amount of Money spent on Schooling as 1000s of undocumented aliens register their Kids in our Public schools and this is a Huge Money drain on the System so yes, here the prescence of the Undocumented Aliens are a HUGE Problem and drain on Taxpayer supported systems. In Colombia, most Americans look for the legal way, for example on Healthcare, they buy insurance and avoid becoming a charge or burden on the Colombian government. These are Ideal Immigrants for Colombia as they spend much more then they take in services.

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 2, 2007, 09:13:

if you are a forigner and show up at the hospital without a cedula and without insurance, a credit card or cash you are turned away.
By DonGringo

Should be that way here in the States also!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Miguel_Clavo says on Jan 2, 2007, 10:22:

I guess the Baghdad Bob of Bogota has never read any posts of foreigners living in Colombia who are posting requests for information on how to overstay their visa, find illegal English teaching positions???.....and thank you for making my argument:

"who is living here in Colombia illegal and then was bitching about people being illegal in the US? Who? Maybe I missed it but I haven't seen anyone do it?'

The OP was referring to Americans in general, but several posters here request ways to circumvent the laws of Colombia. Reading impaired, are we?? Opting to accept the punishment (fine, etc) does not show the respect for Colombian law in the first place as the Americans in the US demand of foreigners in the US. RESPECT FOR THE LAWS OF THE COUNTRY BY THE FOREIGNER is the point of the OP. Whether they contribute to the secondary country or not does not show respect for the laws of the country. Imagine if in the US, all the illegals had to do was pay a fine to stay longer???

"So do we just invent a problem and then post our disgust for it?
I hardly invented anything, but did notice the hypocrisy. i wasnt disgusted with anyone in writing the post, except maybe all the self-proclaimed security experts on PBH and other blowhards....=)

"Or is this the same old tired ass excuse I hear people use over and over. "

hmm..i thought i was given credit for inventing it......changing your circle of friends will fix that....

"That is, not taking responibility for our actions as individuals, no we like to point our finger at someone else doing it to justify us doing it."

i wasnt pointing fingers at anyone in the picture, just pointing out something that appeared to be hypocritical. Personal repsonsibility? what a novel idea! Maybe everyone should take the personal responsibility and respect the laws of other countries while living there.......damn, there is that work RESPECT again....

"Is illegal gringo's a problem in Colombia? I have never in four years met any gringo's here that were not 100% legal so what is this post? "

For the comprenhension challenged: I guess that if its not a problem to a foreigner living in another country, it is not a problem. Respecting the laws of Colombia? what a silly concept!! Could that be the purpose of this post???? (maybe Peter should require us to put the purpose of each post in BOLD or CAPS for all to not be so easily confused.......)

"IN the US you can't throw a potatoe in a kitchen without hitting an illegal." yup, illegals in the US are a definite problem...i agree there.

"How many times I talk to people here trying to get a visa to go to the US and to work illegal. They intend to overstay and live illegal and are mad as hell when the embassy doesn't give them their visa."

How many times do i read posts on PBH here trying to find out how to overstay their 30-60-90-180 day non-immigrant visa, and then possibly finding employment (read teaching English even if not qualified to) in Colombia to live there, even though the conditions of their stay requires them to leave?? The specific intent is also there.

"It happens to me every single day I listen to this crap."

EvErYtHiNg happens to this poster everyday! anyone else ever notice that??? Credibility challenged, i say. =)

"It does not go the other way as I have never heard a gringo asking me how to live illegal in Colombia."

i guees there are 2 versions of PBH available? or do some only see the tree and not the forest?

Looking forward to the response.....

Just my opinion...and brought to you by a kinder and gentler

Miguel_Clavo =).....Colombia es pasión!

"F.A.R.C..S.U.C.K.S"

"I would rather die living life, than to live a dying life."........ Oh, and my PM is always ON. Great Bumper Sticker: "Home of the Free, Because of the Brave"

0 funny, 0 helpful.

1cito says on Jan 2, 2007, 11:52:

Hypocrisy or is Migs Just Bored? "It occurred to me that MANY people of the US appear to subscribe to the doctrine of “Do As I Say, Not As I Do” with regards to respect of the immigration laws of a country."

I know you are dead wrong to say many. Find one example of someone in the US who is all gung ho for "respect of the US immigration laws" but does not show "respect of the immigration laws" of Colombia or any other country. And don't give me this "PBH posted this" garbage. Most posters on PBH have not stated their stance on US immigration law.

Find anything published by any US government agency encouraging a US citizen to not not show "respect of the immigration laws" of Colombia.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Swinn88 says on Jan 2, 2007, 12:03:

I agree with DGringo. I seriously doubt that there are many americans living in colombia and i'm not sure but I would wager that the majority of these living a life in colombia are there legally. Shame on those that are there illegally, however to compare it to what is going on in the U.S.A. is a bit ridiculous. There are Millions of illegals in the U.S.A. the numbers say between 12 & 20 million. I think that the numbers are much more. I would be willing to say that there are more illegal latino immigrants living in the U.S.A. than there are latinos living in any one single central or south American Country. If you find the number of Americans living illegally in colombia, or any other country comparable then you have made a great point. However I believe you would be hard pressed to do so. The people here at PBH looking for an easy route to stay in colombia illegally have number that are miniscule when compared to the number of colombians living illegally in the U.S.A. Answer some questions. Are Children of Foriegners born in Colombia automatic citizens? If an American was in colombia looking for employment in colombia would the american be hired before a colombian? does an American have the right to buy property if he is in the country illegally? or legally for that matter? Are illegal Americans cared for by the colombian government better than colombia citizens? A good friend from Argentina told me he would never become a citizen in the U.S.A. because despite all the hoopla about illegal immigrants, the U.S. government seems to favor illegals over their citizens. he also said he would kill any American singing Argentinas national Anthem in Argentina in English. He also said anyone flying an American flag on their cars at their homes or any other extremely visible place would have some serious problems. I believe the same would be true in Colombia. The truth is that it's a horrible comparison and that anyone immigrating to colombia illegally would never receive the benefits that illegals receive in the U.S.A. They send no money to the U.S. they just live in colombia off of their pensions or savings or whatever income they have from The U.S.A. They are not public charges of the government of Colombia.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Swinn88 says on Jan 2, 2007, 12:27:

By the way most people don't believe that illegal immigrants are criminals. A few people have voiced that terrible opinion and for whatever reason proponents of illegal immigration believe that the majority of Americans feel that way. It's simply not true. Most Americans feel for illegals. However they want them to be Americans. not Foriegners living in America. The truth is I have never met an African Immigrant that didn't speak english(and still have there African Customs. I have never met a person from china, Korea, Norway, Germany, or any other country that didn't eventually learn the language(Old People get a pass on this). However I have family here for 20-30 some have 45 years here and still can not speak a word of English. They want to hold on to there customs. All Americans hold on to their customs because we are all immigrants. We just see other cultures and we blend alittle. Maybe the Jamaican Beef patty is different from empanadas, But they are delicious. The truth is I like them better. I like authentic Italian Sauces. I like Mexican Dishes most of all and no Mexican/American cuisine is not the same as cuisine from other Latin countries. Please lets not forget about chinese food. The Chinese food in Colombia does not compare and certainly does not have the Variety. But we still hold on to customs, like the old italian Immigrants, and Irish Immigrants, and African , and chinese immigrants do. Being an American doesn't make anyone less colombian or Mexican or chinese. In America it makes you better. It Makes You stand out. You speak English and Spanish. You get a better paying job because of it. I dont want to live in colombia in The U.S.A. If I wanted that I would move to Colombia. Colombia is a much better Colombia than we could ever create in The U.S.A. The U.S.A. Is a much better U.S.A. than can be created in Colombia. Hey!!!How many Americans in Colombia Don't learn to speak Spanish and enjoy colombian culture? The Answer is none. They alllearn to Speak Spanish and enjoy the festivals and the food and such. We should do the same when we are out of our countries in in someone elses.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 2, 2007, 13:05:

OTMIAMIMIKE.... I occasionally make it to the MIA area and work my customer base at U of Miami and Jackson Memorial. I am very curious about something that I have observed over the years...I have met a few Cuban refugees that are M.D.'s that cannot pass the U.S. equivalency exams. Usually these individuals settle for low paying lab tech positions in the labs on that campus. In your opinion, is that due to the language barrier (hard to believe that so few take the initiative to learn English) or are the Cuban Med Schools in reality glorified diploma mills? Also, do you have any read on the Spanish surgeon that was recently brought in to examine Fidel? Again, what does this say for the state of the Cuban M.D?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 2, 2007, 13:38:

Athensdawg, interesting comparison you make On Cuban Doctors in Miami. I have met quite a few Cuban Docs and Nurses, as well as Puerto Rican and Jamaician Nurses. The Problem with many Cuban Doctors(as well as Medical professionals from other countries) is that they do not put the effort into first learning English at the Med/technical level. They put the effort into the Licensing which is the Cart ahead of the Horse. A while back, in the 90s, the Florida Board for Physican Assistants gave the Cuban Docs a window where they could take the Physician Assistant Exam(florida) and out of like 20, only 2-3 passed. Many retested,few passed the exam. I think it was the Langauge Barrier as a Cuban MD with a Good Command of English should pass our Physician Assistant with flying colors. Castro has a Medical Study Program for Minority Americans in Havana and the first group has graduated and in a recent miami herald article, one Graduate scored extremely high on the USME Exam so I doubt its course content. Cuban MD Schools have had the course content examined closely here in Florida and the state board is satisfied that the Medical Training is adequate. Cuba also has a large and very advanced(profitable)Bio-Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry so that also speaks well of the advanced state of Medicine,Medical reserach, all things considered, in Cuba. Infant Mortality(source: new england journal of medicine)in Cuba is less then here in the USA so that speaks highly for their preventive medicine system. I think that Specialist(from spain) that was brought in had more Political Connections then Medical into the decision. Then he also may have been brought into Cuba for a second opinion.That happens here in the USA also, Foreign Surgeons giving Seminars on speciality procedures at US Hospitals and Universities. I have seen many Nurses coming from Puerto Rico and these are the most lacking medically. They had an extremely poor pass rate on the Florida Nursing exams. Working with many of them, I see their courses as medically lacking.The Jamacian Nurses seem to be some of the Best Trained of the Foreign Nurses, clinically and scholastically, as their Nursing Programs are modeled after England's Nursing schools. Many Carribbean trained Docs went to Med school in the Dominican Republic and have performed well. My Boss in the 90s at the Krome Detention Center was a Graduate of Eastern University in Santo Domingo. Passed his USME Exam first time around, prior to Krome, he was the Flight Surgeon for the US Coast Guard but his command of English was A1 so he sailed thru the exam. Truth be told, many do not put the effort into learning our Langauge and they pay dearly for it when they sit for their respective medical licensing exams.

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 2, 2007, 14:00:

THANKS MM I definitely appreciate your insight. I knew that you would be the person to ask from some of your previous posts...it's seems so odd that these individuals could dramatically increase their income by learning the language and refreshing their knowledge, but when everyone speaks Spanish, I guess that makes it rather difficult. Thanks again for your time....

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 2, 2007, 18:21:

miamimike I know you acknowledge that the unreimbursed healthcare figure was not all for illegal immigrants, but do you know if it was half? A third? A fifth? Without knowing, I have to say the $500 mil figure is pretty meaningless. As for the undocumented being a huge money drain on the system...well, my thought is that we have tons of huge drains on our system. How do you feel about the US taxpaper subsidising oil companies exploration and granteing them billions of dollars in under-valued leases (at a time for record profits for oil companies)? Or the money wasted at FEMA (also in the billions). Or no competitive bid contracts going to KBR and Haliburton (again in the billions)? These issues are more costly to us than any outlay to pay for services on the behalf of immigrants. I think I have been clear how I feel about the issue of illegal immigration (basically that it is "wrong" , but not that big of a deal) and I respect others rights to disagree. I just have a hard time understanding the vitriol and no one has ever been able to explain to me why immigration is an issue that should trump more important concerns like tax reform, social security, the war against terror, and a fair labor policy.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 2, 2007, 19:04:

A FIFTH OF 500 MILLION IS MEANINGLESS??? you've truly got to be kidding...and keep in mind that those are the figures for Miami-Dade alone. It amazes me that there are individuals that have no problem subsidizing the labor costs of large corporations with no benefit besides a cheaper chicken. Again, you are more than welcome to pay my property taxes to support the education of illegal aliens...and to add salt to the wound, I have no children (nor do I want any, nieces and nephews keep me very busy)...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 2, 2007, 22:46:

Jay1234-Don't know if a study exists on the % Of Undocumenteds who received Healthcare at this one Hospital. It has to be at least 50% though considering the Huge Number of Immigrants we have in Miami-Dade. I'll attribute the other 50% to US Residents or citizens as the last published Figure I saw listed Miami as approx 600,000 who were un-insured in total. Safe to say half off these are undocumented.I work here in the healthcare field and have friends in Jackson so they see the "figures" and have a good idea of the %'s of Undocumeneteds who recieve healthcare here. . Lets not forget the cost of schooling the 1000s of un-documented's Children, a huge Dollar cost also! Add to the fact these Illegals aren't paying their fair share of Tax, quite a tidy sum. El Paso, Texas has it worse then then Miami BTW as their Hospitals are nearly Bankrupt due to un-reimbursed healthcare to illegals. I don't like the other things you mentioned either but that does NOT make it right Illegals don't pay for Healthcare and Education. Would you get away with it their countries??? A free ride, I don't think so! One Cuban(a honduran resident at the time) who came to Miami for (jackson memorial) a Transplant operation wasn't requiered to put down the $250000 Bond Deposit prior to his operation. This Surety Bond is requiered of Foreign patients so the Hospital isn't stuck with the Bill should he die or leave the country. This Cuban ran up a $2.6 Million dollar bill, expired and stuck the Miami Dade County Taxpayers with his Bill! This added to that $500 Million Healthcare Bill.As Cubans are given preferential Treatment in Miami, The Politicans including Jeb Bush(then governor), Illeana Ros lehten and the 2 Diaz Balart Brothers(all congress persons)pulled the strings to get this Cuban a fast Humanitarian Visa to come here then when we Miami Taxpayers were stuck with the Huge Bill these Dead Beat Politicans I mentioned all scooted and evaded responsability(financial).Costs like this are a "Big Deal in Miami as it drives the cost for all legal residents and citizens. Leets not forget the Huge cost disadvantages all these Illegal contractors have by not having the correct state, county and city licenses as well as not having Workingman's Comp, Car insurance ect. This waters down our wages greatly here in Miami as how is an Honest contractor supposed to compete against illegals who don't incur these costs of doing business? They undercut the Honest Conractor and its a Huge Problem here in Miami. They need to have everyone play by the same rule book and its no small penny anty issue either,,,

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 3, 2007, 07:42:

Well we have to think of the numbers. Obviously there are a higher number of Colombians that break U.S. immigration laws than there are U.S. citizens that break Colombian Law. And to a certain degree, immigrants, legal or illegal perform jobs that U.S. citizens won´t do. Well at least in the northeast that is the case. Do you really think an american man wants to be a busboy? The only landscaping I have seen by americans is by the owners of the landscaping business, but their employees are ususally immigrants; sometimes you will see a teenager in or out of highschool doing some landscaping but who would you really rely on, the teenager or the immigrant. Has anyone ever seen a group of unemployed U.S. citizens standing around a corner waiting to be selected to do any work at any given day? I have not.

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 3, 2007, 08:37:

While I do not have concrete figures, somehow I think that more U.S. born Americans take advantage of these free healthcare benefits and leave the hospital with the bill, than immigrants are doiong so. Now some may say, "they as U.S. born are entitled to that," well perhaps but if you remove immigrants from the equation, you will still bitch and moan about it. Another thing is you honestly think that employers only pay of the books to illegals? Hate to break it to you but that is not true and I have seen it. I don't know anything about free healthcare to immigrants, I wish my parents did know because growing up in NYC the few times I got really sick my parents paid out of pocket. I never had insurance growing up and I actually do not have any now either. If I need some medical service I guess I will take a trip to Miami. Now others may argue well U.S citizens have social security numbers and the hospitals can refer their bills to a collection agency. This does not mean the bill will be paid. Think about the kind of people that do not have health insurance. It ios not just immigrants, it is the poorer working class with U.S. born among them. Just think these people getting paid between 6-8 an hour, possibly have a family. You really think they would seriously think "let me see, I can pay this $1000+ medical bill, all I have to do is stop eating for about two years."

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 3, 2007, 08:37:

. Smile if you are a thinker!

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

juancegomez says on Jan 3, 2007, 12:23:

Definitely, make it easier for people to go there legally Because that might be more effective in the long run rather than building the Great Wall of America and nothing else (which of couse doesn't eliminate the need for more U.S. border security, but without a better immigration system, potential illegals will just find more creative ways of getting to the U.S. or elsewhere).

As for the main issue being discussed here, I really don't think that the two phenomenons are directly comparable, given their different scale for one thing, but one line of reasoning does seem sound: breaking laws in one country is, as a general rule, just as condemnable as breaking the laws in another (except for extremely minor or grave cases that are not universally applicable). Doing otherwise may indeed be hypocritical, more often than not.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Swinn88 says on Jan 3, 2007, 14:27:

Guys its not about a better immigration system in the U.S.A It's about making things better for the Immigrants in their own countries. Colombians will migrate to the U.S.A or any other country because it serve their interests. Those interests include security (PBH members don't like to believe that there are security problems in colombia but there are problems. For you Naysayers There is plenty of crime in the U.S.A probably Larger numbers than colombia but i have yet to see a rouge bunch of thugs claiming territory in the U.S.A and killing those that refuse to go along with their practices). There are also Financial gains( you work hard in the U.S.A. and you can pick yourself up and make a better life for yourself). Countries blast the U.S.A. for their foriegn policy but seek help from the U.S.A. They want aid. They want Money. They want help to make their economys better to stop their own people from migrating north. Then get angry because it is an issue in the U.S. The U.S. can't solve Mexicos economic problems nor colombias or any other country. Venezuela makes enough Money just from oil to sustain each individual venezuelan with a moderate stipend and refuse to do say. people are still doing poorly and the Government blaims it on Imperial Capitalist America. I just can't see that being honest. That is why people leave and don't return because it's not fair in their own country. It can only be fixed from the inside. The U.S.A can only do what it can. There are many options that would work. the one that would work best(my opinion) is to deny the undocumented many of the liberties that they have in the U.S.A. People leave familes and build new ones in the u.s.a and cry that we are being separated from our family if we are deported. What about the Family left in Colombia? do they no longer matter? we left them remember? My children are Citizens. I say deny that priviledge. I'm pregnant and have no insurance. Then work harder the next time to keep from having children. The U.S.A can do things like these to curb illegal immigration. A wall won't deter it. I say build big business along the borders not walls and let people work and return to their families if they like. That would also curb illegal immigration. Allow Investment in countries don't deny people a good life because you don't want an outside influence or practices. Don't scream Nativist when it's because of nativisim that people have to immigrate up north in the first place. Immigration is also not just a problem in the U.S.A. Spain is being bombarded with illegal African immigrants at an alarming rate. Not like U.S. numbers but still pretty large numbers. France has an influx of Immigrants that refuse to be french. As a result I predict a grand upheavel in France in the next 20 years between the French and non French in France. If we want our people to stay we must fix the problem in our country. Not in the U.S. COLOMBIA IS A MUCH BETTER COLOMBIA IN COLOMBIA THAN IN THE U.S.A.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 3, 2007, 18:30:

SOME PEOPLE JUST DO NOT GET IT the labor market has become so skewed because of cheap illegal laborers that it has effectively hurt those that can least afford it. Again, I know of no job "that Americans will not do"...it's simple supply and demand at work here. Drive down Buford Highway in Atlanta at 7:00 AM....you'll see what I mean...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 3, 2007, 18:50:

athensugadawg thought that ... ...was Chambodia?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 3, 2007, 18:58:

AZTEC you're crackin' me up guy!!!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 3, 2007, 20:01:

A question... If an American owner has two applicants for the same job at the same wage, one a citizen and the other an illegal immigrant, who does he hire? My guess is that the majority would hire the citizen (in this hypothetical, I am assuming the owner is not trying to get a "hidden" lower wage out of the illegal by not paying overtime, violating labor laws, keeping the worker off the books, etc.). I think given the choice (and assuming that he knows the legal status of each applicant) almost universally, the citizen hires the citizen. So, if in fact the worker hired is the citizen, then in this scenario there is no "immigrants stealing our jobs problem." How then do you explain the disproportionately large number of illegal immigrants in the landscaping, restaurant and construction businesses? Well, some of the illegals must be willing to work for less or do jobs citizens are unwilling to do at the rate paid the illegals. So, if my instincts are correct, supply and demand are setting the price for labor. Take away the illegals, and the wages would have to rise to attract more citizens. This is, I think, what Swinn88 was getting at- better wages overseas to combat the illegal immigrant "problem." But also there is a flip side, worse wages here. Now we don't want lower wages here (it is hard to get by on the minimum wage) to take care of our own citizens, but by keeping wages artificially high here we do several things. We make it more expensive to manufacture here than in other countries, we drive up the price of our exports, and we make it attractive for workers from other countries to come here (legally, or not). Is it possible to drive up wages in other countries? Maybe, but again, then there are trade-offs. We then may have more expensive foreign goods, bad for the American consumer...
athensugadawg - How many illegal immigrants bring their kids when the cross the border? Not many. The majority of the time, it is the children of illegals, born here,and they are US citizens. In this case, it again goes back to my point, the presence of illegals do not contribute much of a burden to education. If there is overburdening in some areas, it may be because of overcrowded schools (wait a minute, logically inconsistent, you say? Nope, my point is that if you are running at say 150% capacity, teacher to student ratio, a handful of illegals are not the problem. Sure every kid counts, but taking them out still doesn't do much to the ratio. It is an education system problem, not an illegal immigrant problem. I will address the healthcare issue in the following post.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 3, 2007, 20:22:

Healthcare...again , not a problem. http://www.rand.org/news/press.06/11.14.html ...
"The report – which appears in the November edition of the journal Health Affairs – estimates that in the United States about $1.1 billion in federal, state and local government funds are spent annually on health care for undocumented immigrants aged 18 to 64. That amounts to an average of $11 in taxes for each U.S. household."

That is per household, in two-earners households, that is $5.50 per earner. I probably lose ten times as much per year due to bad gas mileage as a result of having over or underinflated tires on my car and driving too fast.

Note, ironically, that the article goes against my position regarding education, stating that the costs will be much greater for that than for healthcare. Never one to be afraid to allow for the possibility of rational minds disagreeing with me, I still say, peel the onion back. Mr. Smith, in the report, talks about the costs for educating undocumented aliens' children. In this, he may be correct, but remember, these are citizens in the vast majority of cases. So, again, we are not talking an illegal problem, we are talking an overcrowding problem. I know someone suggested ealier that this is a bad policy, that children of illegals born in US are citizens, but the idea of amending our Constitution for this does not have much support. It may not be universally popular, but it is a fact.
I still stand by my position, there are MANY things that are magnitudes greater costs to us than this over-inflated non-issue. Immigration laws, like all other laws, should be respected, but this is not one to lose sleep over. Either here or in Colombia.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 4, 2007, 04:05:

here in Miami The Free Lunch Education Remains a Huge problem as they(children of illegals) upsurp the resources for which they have not payed for. In Miami gain, many Illegals opertate these Unlicensed Contracting services without the proper licenses which in turn greatly hurt the Honest law abiding contractor as he cannot compete due to his conducting business the legal way. These Illegals water down the wages of Legal Businesses. How could they not??? I support the legal way; as I work with our board of directors at our Condo Complex, I go the extra Nine yards and check out who works with our Lawn Service-if they are NOT legal with verifiable SS Numbers, they are history. We have sent two lawn services packing as they tried to slip in undocumeneted workers. A retired fellow in our complex(an American Retiree believe it or not)has volunteered to take the Job! He said it would Pay Better then his Bagging checkout job at oure neighborhood Publix supermarket.LOL SO much for the BS that these Illegals are taking Jobs some American wouldn't do! This American Retiree has no problem mowing yards and clipping hedges!! LOL

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 4, 2007, 04:36:

miamimike What you describe with the retired fellow tracks with my hypothetical. Your complex, given a choice, hired the citizen over the non-citizen. What gets lost in the "taking jobs Americans won't do" rhetoric is the distinction of "at that pay rate." The retired fellow was willing to work at the offered rate. The issue must be the pay rate offered must be willing to attract citizens over non-citizens. In your complex, an illegal did not take the job over a citizen...so, no illegal "problem," in my view.
I have not done a single bit of research on the free lunch issue (give me some time, I have to go to work in a few minutes, jaja) but since the children of illegals are very often citizens, are you saying that you disagree with paying for "those" citizens over others? I guess the next question I have is how far back do we go in sorting out "true" citizens versus "false citizens." One generation? Two? Five? I think you can see the problem with doing this. Also, I don't mean to sound flippant, but all children use resources they don't pay for- it is part of the social contract, that we pay taxes for services that others use. That is governments role, to provide services that consumers often are in a bad position to provide for themselves. But, is there no payoff? Is our money simply going down the drain? Nope...For every kid (child of illegal or not) who grows up and gets better educated and earns better money, we recoup part of our investment in their education through more taxation. But where's my payback, you might ask? Not sure if this satisfies anyone, but IF Social Security survives, it is there. It takes three workers today to fund the payout to one recipient.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Swinn88 says on Jan 4, 2007, 06:05:

You dont go back generations. You stop it now. For future. The ones here get a free pass. it's impossible to go back generations to fix the problem. There is no payback. You just stop the current process that does not work and promotes illegal immigration. Children use resources that there parents pay for. I have insurance that I pay for so that I can take my child to the Dr. I also pay taxes so that my child can go to the public school of the school district that I live in. I pay taxes that pay the police that protect my children and myself. The truth is that if my taxes go to pay for caring for people that have come here illegally then why don't we just send the our taxes directly to whatever country to pay for schooling of their children and hospital expenses and so forth. There is no easy answer, but there is an answer. It's a difficult one. No one wants to stop immigration but illegal immigration should be curtailed. At what point do you say "hey we have to close the door because its beginning to be a bit to much for us" And that is the point. It would not be an issue if it were not beginning to be a bit to much. So the answer is to say "Sorry we are closed. We will open again after we get a better grip on how to manage things here" And thats what illegal undocumented immigrants don't understand. if a million Americans set up shop in colombia (Illegally)and demanded that the Government assist them, Politicians in Colombia would scream foul in an instant. If they began to carry an american flag while doing so the paramilitary the Government and the Farc would join forces to throw them out of the country. If they sang the colombian national song in English then all hell would break out. I'm sure all at PBH would not have a difficult time believing this would happen. The Governments role is to care for it's people. Not the people that infiltrate by illegal means because they like the benefits better than in their own country. Once again if thats the case then American citizens should just pay and send taxes to care for foriegners in their own countries.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 4, 2007, 06:18:

Illegal Immigration is a Crime

Under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, "Improper Entry by Alien," any citizen of any country other than the United States who:

* Enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or
* Eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or
* Attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact;

has committed a federal crime.

Violations are punishable by criminal fines and imprisonment for up to six months. Repeat offenses can bring up to two years in prison. Additional civil fines may be imposed at the discretion of immigration judges, but civil fines do not negate the criminal sanctions or nature of the offense.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Swinn88 says on Jan 4, 2007, 06:22:

Sounds Criminal to me.
Sounds Criminal to me.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 4, 2007, 06:46:

"A presence of 8 million to

"A presence of 8 million to 11 million illegal aliens in this country is a sign that this country is losing control of its borders and the ability to determine who is a member of this national community. And a country that has lost that ability increasingly loses its ability to determine the rules of its society -- environmental protections, labor protections, health protections, safety protections.

In fact, a country that cannot keep illegal immigration to a low level quickly ceases to be a real country, or a real community. Rather than being self-governed, such a country begins to have its destiny largely determined by citizens of other countries who manage to move in illegally."

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 4, 2007, 06:59:

More reading concerning... ...your friendly Mexican invasion.



http://www.house.gov/mccaul/pdf/Investigaions-Border-Report.pdf

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 4, 2007, 08:50:

Too Bad Bush and His Republican Congress didn't enact stiff immigration reform(or enforce the existing laws on the Book)He had a Golden Oppurtunity and he(they) Blew it bigtime. I say that because the Repubs had the Executive Br and both house of congress-they had all the control and votes and did nothing! All hat and No cattle on Immigration,,,,What a oppurtunity Lost,,,

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 4, 2007, 11:12:

miamimike, 100% correct! Some of us think that is why they lost in the last election.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 4, 2007, 11:12:

miamimike, 100% correct! That is why they lost in the last election.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 4, 2007, 11:24:

" a country that has lost that ability increasingly loses its ability to determine the rules of its society -- environmental protections, labor protections, health protections, safety protections." Sounds like labor union talk to me. Don't you know this kind of talk has now become un-american? It's just about PROFITS BABY, JUST PROFITS!
I recently wrote a composition on the issue of increasing wage disparity between the rich and the rest of the classes. After extensive research, I did not find a single source which even metioned legal of illegal immigration as the possible factor.

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 4, 2007, 11:41:

cali373, were you able... ...to get the composition published in a referred journal?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 4, 2007, 11:50:

miamimike - That is because Bush & Company were too busy making the rich richer and selling an Unnecesary War to make the rich, richer. Besides you have to given them credit, it takes an enormous amount of effort to bullshit a nation of 300 million, and convince them. Immigration is not why the so-called "conservative" Republicans lost control, but had to with the War in Iraq and the obvious corruption and prudent disregard for ethics. I think we lost our way and this thread now has nothing to do with Colombia. Thank you to whoever called my parents responsible immigrants. I like to remember them as immigrants who started a new generation of U.S. citizens. Just as other Latino, Mexican, Italian, Russian, Jewish, Irish, and German parents did when they migrated to this country. And that is the reality of the United States. How many americans has one met that is a direct decendant of a colonial or native american? Not many I assume.

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 4, 2007, 14:05:

Clinton was the best "Republican" president we ever had. The different is he actually threw a bone at the rest of America.

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 4, 2007, 17:12:

A few points... Swinn88: That is exactly what I am debating. That it is not too much too handle. Not in the healthcare arena, nor in the education arena. As far as jobs, immigrants, illegal or otherwise, do have an impact, as do any other market participants. However, it is wage distribution that is the problem, along with a broken system of taxation. My question to you, though, is what are you advocating (as a policy; it is going to be tremendously difficult to ammend the Constitution to accomplish whatever change you advocate, but I am curious what you propose)? Only the children of citizens are eligible for citizenship? And why stop there? If it is our own "self-interest" you care about, how about a caste system where only the productive are eligible for citizenship. A national exam for getting your citizenship? By the way, the earlier posts discussing the muslim immigration problem brings up something interesting. America is strong and does better than Europe BECAUSE we embrace different folks and assimilate them. Compare to Europe where the immigrants tend to mire in an underclass for succesive generations. Nope, I think America is stronger because our second and third generation Americans assimilate and do well. As to taxation...governments spend our taxes for the common good (well, in theory anyway). If I could opt out of which taxes to pay because things don't benefit me, then we would not have a need for taxes. We can't pick and choose.

Aztec: Okay, it's a federal crime. But so is piracy of DVD's, and there are substantial criminal penalties for that. The issue is whether the crime has a serious impact on our society.

miamimike: I think the President's immigration reform proposal was pretty decent. I think most conservatives thought it was too lenient ("amnesty"). I don't know that it was the best policy out there, but an improvement on our current system. But I think his party got smoked in November because he stopped listening to the American people. Mostly about Iraq.

DG: A question about putting the onus on employers. How do you enforce that? And do you make it so that the employers had to know that the person was an illegal, or just say that he took reasonable steps to check. Either way, it is a problem. Huge cost for employers in checking on this, clogged courts (that cost, yes, tax dollars to administer), and higher costs of goods if you make it a strict liabity crime. The other choice is basically making it an unenforceable joke if the employer took "reasonable steps" to check. Either way, I think you have very little effect on the immigration issue.

Finally, I think that part of the debate has to do with what America will look like in 50 or a 100 years. I don't know exactly how it will look, but it will be heavily hispanic. That, however, does not scare me. It is just a fact.

Gonna go eat a Steak now...chao

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 4, 2007, 23:05:

Jay1234-Glad you thought Bush's Immigration Policy Was decent. Many Republicans and Democrats did not. I am one one these middle of the road voters who votes Dem and/or Rep depending on the issues. I cannot see, as many other Americans cannot either, rewarding people who Broke the current US Immigration Law coming here or Overstaying their Tourist' Visas with Amnesty or a path to Citizenship. If any Immigrants deserve a break it should be any of those 1000s of Visa Applicants lined up outside in the Cold and Rain at 4am in the Morning at many of our US Embassies complying with the Law. If anyone deserves a break, its these folks! Reward them for complying with our laws! Bush's plan was NO better then Reagan's IRCA Amnesty program of the late 80s where millions of Undocumenteds were granted Amnesty and citizenship and then Reagan did not close the door after he enacted this Law. As a result, many more came and now we have 12-20 Million more Illegals(depending whose count you use)clamoring for Status. Bush(john McCain, Mel Martinez, Ted Kennedy) would like to do the same now and then 20 years from now in 2027 we will have another 12-20 million Illegals. Enough is enough or the USA as we know it will not exist as it does today,,,Hello India,,

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 4, 2007, 23:14:

Don Gringo I do blame Bush for a Lot Of the Immigration Bungling He had a Golden Oppurtunity do enact meaningful Immigration reform and he stuck his thumb up his Rectum and did nothing. Worse yet, Workplace Compliance under Bush practically went to Zero Arrests! What other President in 20 years has had the chance to pass Immigration Reform as Bush has: The Republicans had ALL the control-Presidency, both Houses(a majority until a few days ago) What more did one party need??????????? They Flubbed it so please don't even try to defend them or use that clinton BS! Bush was prez since 2000 last I knew and they had Total control until a few days ago! Pray tell whose fault, if not Bush and his Party,that Immigration Policy wasn't passed?


excerpt from below link(not a left wing Editorial comment either BTW, far from it)

"June 22, 2005 01:45 PM
Yesterday Richard Stana of the Government Accountability Office told a House panel that under the Bush administration workplace enforcement of immigration violations had fallen sharply. For instance, consider the numbers of employers who received formal letters warning about possible fines for violating immigration laws:

****Under Clinton in 1999: 417 employers****
****Under Bush in 2003: 3 employers*********

In part this is certainly due to more focus on the border and on possible terrorism, and ICE does have a specific program targeting illegal aliens working at sensitive facilities: see the fairly frequent arrests at Navy shipyards for examples.

However, no doubt a good part of the drop-off is due to "other factors."

Complete details in "Employer sanctions decline" (also here as "Auditors find drop in immigration enforcement at worksites"), or in "Critics cite lax efforts to enforce federal worksite immigration"



Lax Workplace Policy much worse under Bush then Clinton and here's the Actual Numbers: http://michellemalkin.com/immigration/2005/06/22/01:45.pm

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 5, 2007, 06:31:

Agree with you miamimike... "He had a Golden Oppurtunity do enact meaningful Immigration reform and he stuck his thumb up his Rectum and did nothing. Worse yet, Workplace Compliance under Bush practically went to Zero Arrests! What other President in 20 years has had the chance to pass Immigration Reform as Bush has: The Republicans had ALL the control-Presidency, both Houses(a majority until a few days ago) What more did one party need???????????"

As a member of that right wing republican party I can assure we are highly pissed at the party and the President for the fiasco. Despite what many would have you believe many of his supporters abandoned him and the party on this issue. Most of the people telling you that was not an issue in the election either don't vote or vote for some democrat. Ask a registered Republican.

Amazingly, Bush and Company still do not care that 90% percent of his people oppose illegal immigration. We support legal immigration and believe the laws should be rigorously enforced.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

cali373 says on Jan 5, 2007, 08:10:

I guess we just don't learn. Left or right wing. It does not matter, its all about keeping power no matter what sovereignty they have to give up. And we will still get taxed. Reality check, it took six years for you guys to figure out that Bush and company do not care what 90% percent of his people think. Could it be a coincidence that the majority of those 90% are not the ones that benefit from Bush's and company policies. The 90% that saw the income of top 10% leave them far behind... Becareful what you ask for workplace enforcement of labor laws does not only include immigration laws but safety laws, breaks, work hours, overtime, payroll taxes, all those other pesky little things that employers like to cut corners on.

Smile if you are a thinker!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Jan 5, 2007, 08:15:

Hard to disagree with you cali373. Just tell the masses what they want to hear, get elected, then to hell with em!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Miguel_Clavo says on Jan 6, 2007, 00:40:

Oh, to be back from the Holidays! Now, to ruffle some feathers.. "You are comparing this huge problem Colombia has with illegal gringos to the problem the states has with illegal aliens? JAJAJAJJAJAJA That is all I should have done in the first place. I have not seen a post in some time of someone wanting to teach English illegally here. " DG

no, i am not comparing the two, just pointing out an observation after reading so many threads regarding how to circumvent and violate immigration laws of Colombia...nowhere did i say that is was in an "epidemic stage", but of course, in your typical overreactionary style of writing, you try to make it such....

"The teachers that I know here are working with visa's. O I still don't get your point. Do you think all teachers here are illegal? " DG

so, uh, i guess you know all the English teachers in Colombia, huh? right, DG, but i hate to break the news to you, just because you dont know anyone illegal has no bearing on if they exist or not.....Did i say all teachers in Colombia are illegal? or are you talking out the wrong blowhole as usual???

"No one should be living here illegally so since you are so adamant about that in Colombia what is your view on people living in the US illegally?" DG

My views on illegal immigration in the US are well posted here, if you care to do your homework.....check out my post:

http://poorbuthappy.com/colombia/node/18052

btw, i am probably more anti-illegal immigrant in the US than most here, and i am Mexican-American!..so much for calling me a hypocrite, eh, DG?

"If speaking in general then you have to compare the problem in general" DG

that is how i presented it, no?

"and not make a pebble into a mountain and compare mountains which is what I believe you did." DG

you added the drama and overreaction to this topic, i was making an simple observation...and suggesting that respect for a country's immigration law is the better way to proceed....

at 1cito:

"I know you are dead wrong to say many. Find one example of someone in the US who is all gung ho for "respect of the US immigration laws" but does not show "respect of the immigration laws" of Colombia or any other country. And don't give me this "PBH posted this" garbage. Most posters on PBH have not stated their stance on US immigration law."

Connect-a-dot time: Lack of respect for US immigration laws by illegals is a very common and often used argument in favoring the strengthening or more stringent enforcement of current immigration laws. It is a common theme to many of the proponents of tighter immigration laws. must be tough living under a rock, huh? Most Americans favor strengthening current laws as well. Many is pretty accurate i would venture to say. But feel free to disagree. =) And since you have been such a longgg member of PBH, let me introduce you to the Visa section on PBH, where there are plenty of PBHers asking for such the information i stated in the OP....it even bleeds over in to the Friendly Talkzone...a little bit of research will prevent one from looking like the porch light is out....=)...and you totally missed the point of the post: it did not center on US immigration policy (it actually centered on a lack of respect towards COLOMBIAN immigration policy), and you missed that which i pointed out being not PBH member- posted positions, but rather general American public on US immigration.....but if you want to turn this post into strictly a US immigration debate, knock yourself out...that topic has been beaten to death many times here. I wrote the post to point out the disrespect of Colombian immigration law.....Oh, and btw...

""Find anything published by any US government agency encouraging a US citizen to not not show "respect of the immigration laws" of Colombia." 1cito

what does that have to do with anything??? are you suggesting that if the US gov't doesnt publish something according to your criteria, that it couldnt possibly be ocurringggggggg?????????

For the others, where did i compare the two countries immigrations laws??? did i say one was worse or better than the other? I think not, as i was simply posting an observation on a rarely discussed hypocrisy that seemed to be occurring....so, if you are going to put words in my mouth, or speak for me, please check with me first so i am at least aware of what you say that i am sayinggg........dont be so rude! =)


Just my opinion...and brought to you by a kinder and gentler

Miguel_Clavo =).....Colombia es pasión!

"F.A.R.C..S.U.C.K.S"

"I would rather die living life, than to live a dying life."........ Oh, and my PM is always ON. Great Bumper Sticker: "Home of the Free, Because of the Brave"

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 6, 2007, 10:09:

GEE, I THINK I'LL TAKE ANOTHER BONG HIT because I KNOW that illegal aliens are not having ANY affect whatsoever on legal citizens of the US...

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 6, 2007, 13:28:

athensudawg Do you really believe the figures in that article you referenced? Annual murder rate of 4380 Americans murdered by illegals?
FBI figures (found at http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/offenses/violent_crime/murder_homicide.html) put the murder rate in US in 2005 at 16,692. TOTAL Murders. Do you mean to tell me you believe illegals accounted for more than 26% of ALL murders in the US? Uhmmm...suggest NOT hitting the bong (jaja...I say this of course as a joke, I like to keep the debate civil and have no interest in letting my posts creep down to the "I am right, you are dumb" post follwed by the "am not, you are," level. Still, friendly humor is good).
Part of my bewilderment is that no one, so far, can justify their position on this issue other than to say "illegals are bad." The anecdotes have not shown that, the figures for unreimbursed medical care do not show it...Other than a general disrespect for the law being bad (which I agree, it is), no one has demonstrated that illegals are having any major negative effect here. Reasonable people can disagree about this, and having the discussion is part of what our democracy is about...but so far, I see little to be concerned about illegal immigration. And it concerns me when patently false figures like the one in the link from WorldNetDaily are cited. It inflames passions and fans knee jerk reaction and in some people it justifies racist reactions. I don't like it one bit.
BTW, I don't think anyone suggests that there in NO effect from illegal immigrants. The issue is if the effect is something to be concerned about and do the pros outweigh the cons.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 6, 2007, 13:42:

Facts get worse... I thought I would debunk the facts in the WorldNet article on murder and that would demonstrate the falsehoods out there. But I got to thinking and I guessed that some might not be convinced. So I dove into the drunk driving deaths issue. Rep. King says that illegal aliens kill 4745 Americans annually as a result of drunk driving. The Centers for disease control tells us that "During 2005, 16,885 people in the U.S. died in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes."
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/drving.htm .
These numbers, if true, would indicate that illegals are responsible for more than 28% of all drunk driving deaths in 2005. Is there anyone who believes that is true?
I am also interested in what PBHers think about whether the facts are intentionally mistated or was Rep. King simply mistaken (at least twice, I bore of researching his irresponsible assertions)? Does anyone else suspect that politicians and pundits are trying to provoke and manipulate public opinion and the voters?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 6, 2007, 16:19:

THAT BONG HIT WAS GREAT!!! in regard to "affect" vs. "effect"...

So Jay, just curious, what numbers are acceptable to you with regard to car crashes and murder? One or two people killed a day by illegal aliens would not be a "major negative effect"? Add to that a couple of people killed a day by illegal drivers? No big deal as long as nothing happens to me or my loved ones? Would half of those numbers that are killed or maimed be acceptable to you? A quarter? Keep in mind that the driver that is driving without a license is in all probability driving without insurance as well...no compensation for the victims while the perp has the freedom to make a run for the border....

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 6, 2007, 17:34:

I won't take the bait... What person says that one murder is acceptable? Of course the answer is none. But let's face it, murders happen. To others, but also sometimes to loved ones. Who it happens to is irrelevant to having a reasonable policy. The question is how many murders committed by illegal immigrants justifies people being outraged and spending billions on enforcement for immigration laws. Especially when violation of those laws have a negligible effect on murder. Do you agree now that the article you cited was factually incorrect? I think by a lot. Because, I would guess that the murder rate by illegals tracks no more than roughly the same percentage of murders commited by citizens. I suspect it is much less. Why? Because most illegal immigrants come here to work. They are good people. Many of them eventually become citizens. The vast majority are working so hard, they do not get involved with high risk situations that result in murder. It is well known that illegal immigrants are incarcereated at much lower rates than citizens. See http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=871071 . They are LESS likely to commit crimes than natives. You have not offered one bit of evidence that withstood scrutiny to say illegals are causing any greater amount of murder than citizens. If they were, then there might be more of a reason for concern. Drugs, poverty, and alcohol abuse are exponentially more related to the murder rate than illegal immigration.
As for compensation issue, it depends on the state insurance laws and how much uninsured coverage a person carries. In most cases, there is compensation.
Which issue justifies spending between four and eight billion dollars to build a fence? And do you not agree that spending that money on police, the drug problem, poverty problem, or creating an underinsured motorist compensation fund would be a better allocation of funds if you want to deal with murder and/or motorists hurt by other underinsured motorists? Murder and drunk driving deaths are bad. I am simply saying it is non-sense to think the best way to tackle those problems is by immigration enforcement.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 7, 2007, 07:52:

AND SPEAKING OF COMPENSATION.... last year a wife of a cousin of mine was involved in an accident. The driver of the other car was an illegal alien (Mexican), who happened to be very drunk. The wife of my cousin was almost killed...she was in the hospital for three months. SUPRISINGLY...the drunk illegal alien had insurance. The problem...the insurance refuses to pay. The Insurance Commissioner of Georgia has now prohibited the company that covered the drunk driver from selling insurance within the State of Georgia. This whole situation is extremely ironic given that my cousin is an employee of the insurance industry and has helped me on a couple of occasions with insurance matters. OK....so my question to you is this...what was this idiot that almost killed the wife of my cousin doing here in the first place? And why was he driving drunk in a blatant display of disrespect of our laws? So you see, it is very relevant to me and my family and to make crime a simple game of statistics is a very easy way of denying the problem.

Oh yeah...thought you would enjoy a little info about MS-13 while we're talking about crime....really nice guys, maybe you should hang with them sometime...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-13

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Sr Tertius says on Jan 7, 2007, 09:11:

The Constantly Shifting Argument First, I'm not really interested in the topic. What caught my attention is the prevalence of the CSA, the constantly shifting argument, a style that I thought unique to Gomezman5 and GIB, but apparently is much more popular in PBH, as displayed here. BTW, with GIB the argument shifted so much that he even "shifted" his name to DonGringo. Anyhow, I think it goes something like this:

A: Postulate (illegal immigrants are extremely dangerous)
J: Debunk (No: they are not more dangerous than natives)
A: Sneakly shift (any level of danger is bad)
J: Debunk 2 (Policy is not based on "any level of danger")
A: The testimonial shift (but it happened to me. Stats are crap)

My predictions...

J: Debunk 3 (policy is informed but not based on anecdotes or testimonials)
A: The context shift ("you are quoting me out of context, you don't understand what I am saying...")

ad infinitum.

Just thought of pointing that out.

"When the finger points to the moon, the fool looks at the finger" (Chinese proverb)

0 funny, 0 helpful.

1cito says on Jan 7, 2007, 11:16:

Miggy, thanks for pulling the rock . . I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say or maybe I just don't understand your point (English isn't my first language).

"MANY people of the US appear to subscribe to the doctrine of “Do As I Say, Not As I Do” with regards to respect of the immigration laws."

When you say MANY in this statement I took this to mean many want tighter immigration laws for the USA (Do as I say), AND these same people do not respect immigration laws for other countries (Not As I Do). And I was asking for an example of this from a US citizen with respect to immigration laws. Out of all of those "Not As I Do" posts on PBH that you are referring to how MANY corresponding "Do as I say" post will you find?

Thanks for the introduction to the Visa section (its a great section). To return the favor, let me introduce you to the idea that the duration of ones current PBH handle has nothing to do with how long one has been reading the forum. You can thank me later . .

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Miguel_Clavo says on Jan 7, 2007, 11:55:

Pobrecito: do your homework, and read up on current immigration opinions of the american public. "Many", meaning a lot of people, of the American public prefer a tightening, as opposed to a loosening, of immigration controls. Maybe a translator can help in this case. "Many people" refers to a portion of the US public.

Now, you write that i wrote "BUT MANY do not respect immigration laws for other countries (Not As I Do).", emphasizing that i said "MANY do not respect immigration laws for other countries." Please locate in the OP where i wrote this, or are we just making things up, or are you writing on my behalf, now?

This is what i wrote below, Pobrecito, and please not that there are ++question marks++ (like these: ????). Note that i did not claim that most of the US people who are anti-illegal immigrant are simultaneously also anti-compliant with the immigration laws of other countries. Please note the distinction. The other group of people, many of them Americans (US), are posting things like how to remain in Colombia (immigrate and remain) while on a tourist visa (non-immigrant and must leave after X # of days), best ways to find employment even though i am not legally allowed to on a tourist visa, etc, ad nauseum....

"But what of the US citizens who “immigrate” to Colombia, and violate the immigration laws of Colombia? How many posts have occurred here on PBH where foreigners in Colombia request information on ways to violate Colombian immigration laws by overstaying their visas, finding employment when not authorized by their visa conditions, etc?"

"To return the favor, let me introduce you to the idea that the duration of ones current PBH handle has nothing to do with how long one has been reading the forum." Pobrecito

i agree with you as i have stated the same many times when new poster enter the fray. But, do your homework first, then post responses. and maybe this wont happen again: " ...maybe I just don't understand your point (English isn't my first language)...."

BTW, if we ever meet the first beer is on me.....=)


Just my opinion...and brought to you by a kinder and gentler

Miguel_Clavo =).....Colombia es pasión!

"F.A.R.C..S.U.C.K.S"

"I would rather die living life, than to live a dying life."........ Oh, and my PM is always ON. Great Bumper Sticker: "Home of the Free, Because of the Brave"

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 7, 2007, 13:46:

Sr Tertius LMAO....I think you have nailed it. I don't have first hand knowledge about what happened with G5 and DG, but I see what you are talking about. Also, despite what many would suspect, I do not have any particularly strong feelings on the subject. Part of my point is that the subject of illegal immigration is not that important compared to others much more pressing issues: War. Taxes. Social Security. Global Warming. Trade. Education. Poverty. All these are way more important IMHO and have a greater effect on American public. Ok, all that said, and with full knowledge now of where we are about to go...I continue:

Athensugadawg- Before I go into the argument, very sorry for your cousin's wife's accident. That being said, I have two points.

The fact that a an event occured to a family member is of course personal to the family. But it is not a good basis for making policy. If so, EVERY event that occurs would make that issue a priority. It would become impossible for our legislatures to figure out what to do, because everything would be pressing. That is why we look to objective evidence and hard numbers to assess how big any certain problem is. The silence has been deafening in response to the questions I have asked. I don't want to put words in anyones mouth, so if I am wrong on this, please let me know. But I will assume since you did not answer me that you agree now that the figures from Rep. King are flat wrong. That illegals commit less crime than natives (all types, including murder and drunk driving). And that there is a system of compensation for victims of uninsured motorists.
The second point I have is that what happened to your family member was as a result of the action of the insurance company, which, presumably acted illegally because there must have been some basis for the Commissioner to suspend their right to sell insurance in Georgia. It is an insurance problem, not an illegal problem.
As to MS-13, I did not read your wikipidia article. Why? Because I have in the past, in the military, travelled extensively throughout South and Central America. More than 10 deployments. So I have been briefed and have first hand knowledge on the subject. They are bad people and a major threat to regional stability. But that fact does not strengthen the argument that HERE we need to step up immigration enforcement. It is again a boogeyman cited to scare people into feeling something needs be done. Even counting MS-13 illegal aliens (an important distinction, because the MS-13 citizens here are not an illegal problem, they are a gang problem), do you still not agree that non-native crime is lower than that of citizens here? If so, than I just don't see the basis for pouring our resources into immigration enforcement when it does not impact the issue you are concerned about.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 7, 2007, 16:24:

JAY... you're not going to change your mind...I'm certainly not going to change mine. And I have definitely done my share of travel too on the same roads that you have been on in Central and South America. But keep in mind one thing....being here ILLEGALLY is a CRIME in itself. Such a shame 9/11 could have been at least partially prevented had we picked up the Saudi illegals that overstayed their visas....but that's not a big deal, right?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

1cito says on Jan 7, 2007, 16:35:

Miguelito, I guess I misunderstood. I was thinking the "I" of "Do As I Say, Not As I Do" (with regards to immigration laws) was referring to the same enity (those who are for tighter immigration).

But I still do not see the hypocrisy. Is the hypocrisy on those PBH posters who are trying stay or find work illegally?

Second round of beers are on me.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 7, 2007, 16:56:

I've always said... that reasonable people can disagree. But having the debate, even if it does not change either proponents position, is healthy. I am curious if readers views have changed as a result of this discussion?

As to the crimnality of illegal status, as I stated earlier, so is DVD piracy. Or buying knockoff merchandise. The question is what should our reaction be to the crime. Remember, every dollar spent on one thing is a dollar not spent on something possibly more useful to society.

As to 9/11... I still respect your right to disagree. But we have gone in this discussion from healthcare costs, education, crime and uninsured motorists to now blaming terrorism as a result of illegal immigration. Are you now going to say that stamping out illegal immigration would have prevented 9/11? I suppose that they couldn't have boarded international flights and trained overseas with the same outcome? Again, I believe that you are picking the wrong culprit as causing a bad result. In this instance, I think the 9/11 Commisison was correct in pointing out that intelligence failures, lack of inter-agency communication and layered bureaucracy were major culprits in failing to stop the attacks. If those tasks had been done better it would have had a greater impact (and have kept us safer from all sources of terrorism than just hijackers) than illegal immigration enforcement. An even more directly related way to have prevented them from blowing up the WTC? Tighter airline security before 9/11. The connection to illegal immigration is remote at best.
Sr Tertius, is this your prophecy come true? jaja.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 7, 2007, 17:48:

A sensible solution to many problems... I think anyone following this thread can see the two positions that have emerged. Illegal immigration either is or is not a serious problem. Readers will have to decide for themselves which argument has more merit. But as I was thinking further about it, I would also like to offer what I think would be a relatively simple way to address the concerns that are out there.
Illegal immigration, serious problem or not, is a result of the US being an attractive place to be for immigrants. It is a better way of life here. I just feel the vitirol is useless and the billions spent on enforcement are a waste. What would be a relatively simple way to deal with the issue? A solid guest worker program. Give immigrants a way to register as guest workers. Basically make it attractive for them to register, give them recourse against unscrupulous employers and thereby take away incentives for employers to violate labor laws. Tax the workers income. Make it possible for them to return to their home countries without worrying about the problems they face now in coming and going. Give them licenses. I think this would allow for a cheap source of labor (that companies want), allow those who just want to work for a period to come and then return to their home countries, and it would make the whole process more transparent. I believe given a choice between working illegally, with all the problems that causes and being a guest worker with a legal status, most would choose to be legal guest workers. This is a broad stroke description. Of course, there are many questions that would need to be addressed. Limits on numbers? Time period limitations? Increased penalties for employers who still hire illegals? Rates of taxation? What exact benefits guest workers can expect in return for taxation? What other services can they access? Healthcare? Education for children? A pay as you go insurance fund? This is, of course, not my original idea, there are many proposals out there that have discussed this, including the Administration. But whatever the nuances, the main idea sounds reasonable to me.
All of this assumes that a different policy than what we have is needed. I think there are MANY problems with our current system, but it may be that our current system is working enough (minus the huge outlays for ICE and DHS budget increase and fence building) that we don't need to tinker with it. However, if we do, I think guest worker program is better than fences and stepped up enforcement domestically.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

athensugadawg says on Jan 7, 2007, 19:59:

JAY.... I have absolutely no problem whatsoever with a comprehensive guest worker program. My beef is that I personally feel that it is imperative that we know who and how many are here in this country. Besides being able to know who is here, it would also allow for the modulation of the influx according to the economic conditions. Georgia is rapidly becoming the hub of illegal immigration, it possibly has the largest number of illegal immigrants per capita of any state. There are areas that are honestly reaching the breaking point, and oddly enough they are primarily relatively rural with a large agricultural base...I recently saw a report on CNN where 50% of preschoolers in a small town in GA I have never heard of are immigrants (there was no comment on whether the children are citizens or have papers).

Amnesty....we may disagree on. Reagan granted amnesty during his tenure, and presently it looks like millions again feel it is a birthright by just being here. This would simply serve to reinforce criminal behavior for those that have yet to cross illegally into this country. And sadly enough, many of our elected officials still do not get it...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Sr Tertius says on Jan 7, 2007, 20:46:

"Sr Tertius, is this your prophecy come true?" Jay1234: I take my hat off to you. Seriously. Your persistence on unreciprocated politeness and clarity has yielded more affable replies and maybe some closure on agreements and disagreements. Me, I would've replied with juvenile sarcasm: It's not so much arrogance as lack of patience.

"When the finger points to the moon, the fool looks at the finger" (Chinese proverb)

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Jan 8, 2007, 07:10:

We Already have a Template For A sucessful Guest Worker program. Trouble is some of our large industries care not to use it; they would rather do things illegally and so would some of the workers. Herein lies the problem. The Florida Sugar Industry south of Lake Okeechobee has had a Successful guest worker program for decades. The Workers came from the Bahamas and Jamaica. They came for the Sugar Cane Cutting season and as soon as it was (is) over, they return home. They know they have to return home from the getgo. While here, the industry supplied housing at very good(subsidized) rates, they have meals and healthcare provided. Many of the same workers came for decades, The Sugar industry even sponsored some of these workers for LEGAL(Key)for permenent US Residency at their plants in Clewiston, depending on Need and demand of the industry. The Industry was happy as were the workers. Many workers used their earnings to build some pretty nice houses in the islands as well as bsuinesses. Their Kids had a chance at College with their earnings here, some came to south florida for their university education. The Key word is Legal-all this done the legal way and the Cane workers knew the Gameplan well in advance-when the season was over, they go home. This program is largely in disuse now due to mechanized Cane Cutters so not many workers are needed these days. This guest worker plan could be used for many other agriculture states also but we need a handle who is in this country for the betterment of the USA. Work in Immigration for any more then a day or so and you will soon see the results of illegal, unbrideled immigration and what it does a country and its limited resources,,,

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

jay1234 says on Jan 8, 2007, 18:13:

ya termino Athensugadawg- Not sure we disagree on "amnesty." Depends on the terms. Not everyone who wants should be given instant status. However, there probably should be mechanisms for those who contribute to our society to eventually gain some status. Maybe just permanent residency? Probably safe to say we do disagree on the re-enforcing criminal behavior (mainly on the significance of that behavior...right back to our main debate jaja).

Sr Tertius- Yeah, I understand the temptation. I think the reason I have started here with the attitude of only being civil and patient is if not, others who read will miss the argument. Plus it's more fun to me. I think if you go right to just dismissing other posters who don't follow what you are saying, you give up any chance that they or others will be persuaded. But I do read others "wars," and laugh at them.

Miamimike- I think we are agreeing....jajaja. But, you see by having an expanded guest worker program, we can turn the illegal to the legal...the point is that changing the status shouldn't have too much to do with the overall effects of immigration (legal or not) in our country. I am still saying illegal immigration is not a big deal compared to many other pressing issues. But to get the desired policy outcomes, a expanded guest worker meets everyones needs nicely.
Not to be oppositional, but I would also say that I don't buy the argument that working for a day (or a year) in immigration is neccesarily helpful to gaining an accurate picture. Through the debate we've been having here, the facts have simply not borne out the premise that illegal immigration is that bad. And I suspect that working in such an environment (I think you are talking about detention centers) may tend to make one less objective. This example may be simple, but I think it is true. It is like the television show House. Foreman is a neurologist, Cameron is an immunologist, and Wilson is an oncologist. Well, invariably, when a patient walks in the hospital, Foreman thinks it is a neurological problem, Cameron suspects a virus, and Wilson always thinks cancer. Being around a situation too much ca