PBH / colombia (travelguide, pictures) / post

Colombia's True Crime

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/5C1D8645-FB9D-4EBF-B2E5-112C064...

By romy on May 22, 2008, 16:40 in Politics & the war. AddThis Social Bookmark Button


romy says on May 22, 2008, 16:45:

Colombia’s true crime
By Will Stebbins, Al Jazeera’s Americas bureau chief

It has been an article of faith since the days of the Pablo Escobar, one of Colombia's most feared drug lords, that extradition to the US was the worst of all punishments and to be avoided at all costs.

Escobar is reported to have had judges assassinated for even broaching the idea, and is reputed to have organised the 1985 assault on the Colombian supreme court which killed half its members.

His personal prison, La Catedral, invariably described as "luxurious," is the model for doing time in Colombia.

But the drug trade has always been a vicious, fratricidal business, and with its growth, and fragmentation, has become ever more so.

And now, Diego Murillo Bejarano, a former lieutenant of Escobar's, is himself in the US after a recent mass extradition of alleged drug lords.

"Don Berna", as he is affectionately called, rose from the Medellin cartel to become one of the leaders of the main right-wing paramilitary group, the United Defence Forces of Colombia (AUC).

An astounding 13,000 people registered XX WHERE? to hear him confess his crimes, as part of the peace process, or Justice and Peace Law, negotiated by the Colombian government for the demobilisation of the paramilitaries.

Even under the perverse terms of this law, which many critics say sacrifices justice for peace, and allows "Don Berna" and his comrades to confess to crimes and pay reparations for leniency, he would surely have to serve some time in jail.

It is no great leap of the imagination to suggest that his chances of surviving a prison sentence are far greater in a US federal penitentiary, safe from his many enemies, than in a Colombian jail.

What then appeared at first to pose a potential threat to the peace process, the government’s sudden decision to mete out the ultimate punishment of extradition to "Don Berna" and 13 other top paramilitary commanders, may just turn out to be a fortuitous coincidence of interests.

For Alvaro Uribe, the Colombian president, it was a clear triple victory.

'Para-politics'
The media in both the north and south have noted that one of Uribe's primary policy objectives is the signing of a free trade agreement with the US.

The extradition was seen as an attempt to curry favour with the US, to convince Democratic politicians opposed to the deal that Colombia was committed to protecting US interests, placing the demands of US criminal justice above its own legal processes.

One domestic dimension that has received less attention in the north, but is playing big in Colombia, is the seemingly abrupt end that the extradition has brought to the national soap opera called "para-politics".

This is the ongoing series of revelations of close government ties - and Uribe's political allies in particular - with the paramilitaries.

Everyone had been waiting for the climax, as the paramilitaries, in their Justice and Peace testimony, had provided a steady trickle of names and hinted of far more to come.

Currently, 65 Colombian congressmen are facing charges, with 31 already convicted for ties to the paramilitaries.

The last to be arrested in connection with the ongoing scandal is the president's cousin, Mario Uribe Escobar.

Farc drama
The extradition not only brought down the curtain before the anticipated conclusion, it cleared the stage, allowing the world to focus on the contents of the laptop allegedly belonging to the late Farc leader, Raul Reyes, and on the alleged ties of Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan president, to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia [Farc] group.

The extradition happened in the early hours of Tuesday and Ronald Noble, the secretary-general of Interpol, certified on Thursday that the files on Reyes' computer, which according to the Colombian army had been rescued following an attack on a jungle camp in Ecuador, had not been tampered with.

By Saturday, Semana, a Colombian weekly magazine, was running a story that the attorney-general of the city of Medellin was complaining both the hard drives and mobile phone 'SIM' cards belonging to five of the extradited paramilitaries had been 'lost.'

A good week for Uribe.

No regrets
There has been talk of the Peace and Justice process continuing, with the former paramilitaries testifying via closed circuit television from their federal penitentiaries in the US.

Yet now that they have been extradited, it is unclear what their motivation would be to play along.

It was never a role for which they were ever particularly well suited.

These are not, after all, the kind of men disposed to unseemly acts of contrition.

When they testified, there were no tears, hand wringing, or begging for forgiveness. Rather, they read from their laptops, listing crimes as though they were financial data.

It will undoubtedly be a relief that the US Justice Department does not seem remotely interested in how many trade unionists they have assassinated - another annoying obstacle to the trade deal - or how many peasants they have had massacred.

They will only be asked to talk about how much cocaine they have shipped to the US.

The indictments did include membership in a "terrorist" organisation among the charges, but by now it should be clear that "terrorism" as a category refers often only to crimes committed against the US, and US interests.

In their quest for leniency in their new circumstances, they may very well resort to the "Ahmed Chalabi strategy": To get what you want, tell them what they want to hear.

Regional conflict
It will be interesting to see if any of them end up with jail terms in the high double figures.

A strategically lurid tale about Venezuelan smuggling routes, or claims of Hugo Chavez himself loading kilos of cocaine onto US bound planes, could have federal prosecutors breathing heavy, and slashing sentences.

The need to discredit and isolate Venezuela is as important a shared policy for the two allies as the signing of the trade deal.

Uribe does not want a peace process with the Farc; even if their atrocities are no worse than those committed by the demobilised paramilitaries.

He is committed to a military solution in Colombia, and receives a healthy US stipend, via Plan Colombia, to stay committed.

Hugo Chavez has offered to mediate the conflict on countless occasions, and seems to be the only one able to negotiate the release of Farc-held hostages, which had made him a regular stop for visiting European officials.

And Uribe was running out of reasons for rejecting his overtures.

The revelations from Raul Reyes' laptop, which now claim all the headline space in Colombia, effectively neutralise Chavez politically.

He is now disqualified as an objective mediator.

Trading for justice
George Bush, the US president, has had no more stalwart an ally than Alvaro Uribe. Uribe not only continues to praise the Iraq war, but has also suggested it as a model for how the conflict in Colombia might be resolved.

Bush is famously loyal to his friends, and the extradition might well be the gift that secures Uribe's political future.

The big losers in all of this are the thousands of Colombians who had been asked to give up the right to see justice take its course, for the hope of finding out the location of the mass grave where their murdered loved ones are buried.

They will have to give that up, as well, for the sake of a trade deal.

As one Colombian trade unionist at a demonstration outside the US congress in protest against the trade deal, asked me: "Is it better to try someone for shipping five kilos of cocaine to the US, or for killing more than 2,000?"

0 funny, 0 helpful.

romy says on May 22, 2008, 16:50:

This really stood out for me:

"The big losers in all of this are the thousands of Colombians who had been asked to give up the right to see justice take its course, for the hope of finding out the location of the mass grave where their murdered loved ones are buried.

They will have to give that up, as well, for the sake of a trade deal. "

0 funny, 0 helpful.

juancegomez says on May 25, 2008, 19:10:

The article is at least far more reasonable than others, I give it that.

But I think it explicitly overestimates the contribution of these paramilitary chiefs to the parapolitical scandal...completely ignoring that other testimonies and investigations jump started it even before these individuals began to slowly and selectively reveal real or only alleged details implicating a few more politicians.

In fact, I'd say they were only a secondary source of information (overall, not in all cases), in practice if not in theory, and it's unclear how many of their claims are actually real.

And they were remarkably slow about admitting their own crimes, which they also justified on more than one occasion.

In fact, according to an estimate published somewhere (in more than one place, I believe, don't have the link handy), it would have taken hundreds of years for the process to finish at the current rate. That is ridiculous, and I think it should be taken into consideration before claiming that things were working like clockwork.

And don't get me started on the painfully pathetic amounts they had provided as reparations.

In other words, it's not like the over 60 congressmen who are being investigated (and the 30 something who are being charged, not "convicted", which means something else) were all specifically named *only* by the leaders who were extradited, even though some definitely were.

It's also not like there weren't many other paramilitaries, not the big bosses but often lower ranked commanders and fighters, who were providing specific data about crimes and mass graves (which makes a lot of sense, when you think about it...the big bosses aren't exactly encyclopedias with an infinite memory of thousands of crimes, while local forces might have a clearer idea of the crimes they participated in). Some of these individuals are still collaborating with justice and their testimonies are also part of the parapolitical investigations (Pitirri, anyone?).

But that is not mentioned in this article.

Also, as cold as it may sound, it's become evident that many victims were not in any mass graves but dumped into rivers or otherwise disposed in ways that their bodies will never be found. Some of the testimonies already processed have openly explained this.

So I cannot entirely agree with the conclusions and descriptions in this article.

I understand that, however, it would have been better to not extradite all of them at once, but that doesn't mean some of them didn't deserve it, even if the government also sought to do some damage control.

Some truth may have been sacrificed, for whatever reasons one wants to present, but it's not like there aren't other avenues which are still quite open. This isn't the end of the scandal and it isn't the end of other things, unless one wants to give up the fight for justice. This isn't the best scenario, no it is not, but the victims and those who support them must push forward.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

More posts by the same author:

Colombia v. Uruguay 22

COLOMBIA: International Criminal Court Scrutinises Paramilitary Crimes 3

Anybody care to explain Uribe and allies? 4

A Viagra pill is sold every two minutes in Colombia 57

ICC Prosecutor visits Colombia 1

Colombia arrested 400,000 drug traffickers 4

Colombia vs. Ecuador 21

The Road to Tyranny in Colombia- A Third Term in Office 57

"despierto con una Colombia en el 2014, cuando el presidente Uribe esté entregando la Presidencia, con cero guerrillas, con cero paramilitares, dedicado todo el esfuerzo de seguridad del Estado a combatir el narcotráfico" 8

Corruption around the World in Thai 1

Morales holds on in Bolivia 2

I'm So Disgusted 73

Colombia as a Model for Latin America 10

Colombia’s Democratic Hero Could End Up Compromising Its Basic Institutions 27

Colombia: Forced internal displacement overwhelming capacity to respond 6

International Tribunal of Opinion Violation of Human Rights in Colombia As a State Crime 1

Colombia confronts its bloody past 2

Letter to NY Times editor: U.S. Aid to Colombia 0

Oh Bible Belt Conservatives keep making Everyone Proud... 31

Daily Chart: A Drugs Racket 10


Americas:

Mexico

Cuba

Colombia

Venezuela

Ecuador

Brazil

Bolivia

Peru

Chile

Argentina

Africa:

Kenya

Congo

Malawi

South Africa

Asia:

China

Japan

India

Nepal

Thailand

Laos

 

Travel:

Travelguide writers

Travelicious

Travel with kids

Around the world trips

Learn travel Spanish

Off topic: your thing

Also:

All forums

Travelers

If you're not a part of this travelicious experiment just yet, just sign up here. It's free & easy.

 

About poorbuthappy | About the travel guides | Travel guide editing | Community rules

© 1998 - 2008 Peter Van Dijck, all rights reserved.