PBH / colombia (travelguide, pictures) / post

Colombian hostage taken with Betancourt freed

7 minutes ago

HAVANA (AFP) - Colombia's Marxist FARC rebels Tuesday freed Clara Rojas, kidnapped with French-Colombian politician Ingrid Betancourt in 2002, and some other abductees, Cuba's official news agency Prensa Latina reported.


Prensa Latina said the freed captives were believed to have been handed over to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

By NataliaV on Dec 18, 2007, 10:55 in Friendly Talkzone. AddThis Social Bookmark Button


juancegomez says on Dec 18, 2007, 10:56:

Apparently not free yet, to be freed, and they are supposedly three hostages, including Clara Rojas and her child.

What I just posted in P&W:

--------
Diciembre 18 de 2007

Farc anunciaron la liberación de Clara Rojas, su hijo Emanuel y Consuelo González de Perdomo

La revelación la hizo la agencia de noticias Prensa Latina. El grupo guerrillero también calificó de improvisada la propuesta del Gobierno de crear una zona de encuentro para el acuerdo humanitario.

La agencia asegura que recibió un comunicado firmado por el Secretariado de las Farc, que dice: "la orden para liberarlos en Colombia ya ha sido impartida".

En el comunicado de siete puntos, las Farc insisten en el despeje militar de Florida y Pradera por 45 días para concretar un acuerdo humanitario.

Sobre la zona de encuentro dicen que es una propuesta para dialogar con "el mentiroso comisionado Restrepo, en inhóspitos, remotos y clandestinos lugares, con plazo de 30 días".

Así mismo, dicen que "la anulación de la gestión facilitadora (de Hugo Chávez) fue un acto de barbarie diplomática contra el legítimo jefe de un estado hermano y contra el pueblo venezolano, solidarios con la solicitud hecha desde Bogotá".

Agregan, que ese fue un portazo al presidente Nicolás Sarkozy, a los mandatarios latinoamericanos solidarios con la tarea facilitadora y "a los familiares de los prisioneros de guerra de las dos partes que presentían más cerca el final de sus angustias", indicaron las Farc.

http://www.eltiempo.com/conflicto/noticias/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTERIOR-....

0 funny, 0 helpful.

NataliaV says on Dec 18, 2007, 11:29:

yeah - I saw that, but my spanish isn't that advanced, so I always seek out the english version ;-)

This is great news. I am excited to see what comes of it.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 18, 2007, 11:47:

Let's hope more follow, but great news.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

fecherklyn says on Dec 18, 2007, 15:22:

"Lets hope more follow, but great news".

I also hope there are more to come but I suspect what will follow is more predictable; Chavez and minions use this as a reason to further vilify the Colombian Govt for not letting him continue his mediation efforts.

I feel the mediation qualifications of Chavez really need some scrutiny. If he is hand-in-hand with the FARC does he need mediation skills?

Of course, if the "We all hate Colombia" campaign is still today's flavour with Chavez this can/should be just another broadside. No doubt he will soon discover another revelation about S. Bolivar.....that the Liberator forecast Colombia's demise under a President with the initials A.U.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Simon says on Dec 18, 2007, 15:48:

It's about freaking time!

HERE'S SIMON!!!!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 18, 2007, 17:20:

Has anyone noticed the timing of this release and who exactly are being released???
Not to be cynical but this is FARC and Chavez we're talking about. This falls on the heels of the "maleta"gate scandal and worse; revelations from an ex farc member made to Spanish newspaper El Pais alleging that Betancourt is in Venezuela and FARC would release her whenever Chavez gives the order.

And who's being released? Of the 3, Clara Rojas is the lover or the ex lover of a guerilla and her son. Why not release a few more hostages??

While I do feel for Ingrid Betancourt's plight I don't feel as sorry for her as I do for the other 600 hostages. Ingrid and Clara voluntarily went into FARC territory after repeatedly ignoring the advice of Colombian politicians not to do so as well as refusing military protection that was offered to them at the time.

If you warn a child not to play with fire and she goes ahead and places her hand on the grill..I'm sorry but I don't feel too bad for her when she screams "OUCH!"

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 19, 2007, 00:53:

It is strange but I have not read that Chavez hated Colombia.
He made speeches against Uribe but I suppose that many Colombians do not love Uribe (especially in Bogota where they elected as Alcade a man for whom uribe said not to vote).
For that reason are they against Colombia?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aztec says on Dec 19, 2007, 01:26:

aguardiente, Maybe you just need a little more information.

Venezuelan troops accused of
killing a Colombian on the border
http://english.eluniversal.com/2007/12/18/en_pol_art_venezuelan-troops...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 19, 2007, 05:03:

Aztec, I do not understand where you see hate for Colombia in this killing ????

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Dec 19, 2007, 05:24:

Catherine b...You are really trying to equate teaching a child right from wrong with a person who was trying right a wrong by going outside her comfort zone and into a clearly dangerous situation? If you look at history, effective change has usually involved some brave soul or souls putting themselves in harms way for what they believe. Your suggestion that Ms. Bettencourt, somehow got what she deserved is not only insensitive but ignorant. According to your logic no one should travel to, or do business in Colombia because of the advance warnings our respective Governments have issued.
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_941.html

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Cartagena Hooker says on Dec 19, 2007, 06:02:

Betancourt was a psudo intelectuial, upper class heroine, of the French. She had less than 1% of the vote and gave away viagra with the slogan " stand up for Colombia. She is typical of the bored ruling class. She, (until now) had never experienced poverty and hardeship. Her venue was the fincas and secured estates of the power brokers and university professors who scream, hijo de puta, at Uribe. The lower and middle class think what she did was stupid and think her present learning experience is "justo". I have very little sympathy for one who thinks she can embrace FARC and call them brothers. She expected that she would be treated as a fellow traveler and work together with them to find a better Colombia. in actuality they are nothing but bandits using a mission of equality to con the ignorant in the fashion of Saint Che and his buddy Fidel. She got what she deserved.
I am reminded of a Christmas party in Cali with a tango show and cuban orchestra in a house where the daughter asked whether she should go to spain to learn meditation from a fameous guru or attend classes at an ashram in Delhi. She had just returned from a Green Party peace rally in Bogota . I told her at least she will see india. Although the corpulent beauty could have used a spa vacation with Ingrid. Cartagena Hooker

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 19, 2007, 07:42:

In response to ellbee2, I'm neither insensitive nor ignorant. But you're obviously very ignorant of the history of Farc if you seriously believe that Ms. Betancourt was gonna make a "positive change" by venturing into Farc controlled territory. For over 40 years the Colombian government has tried to negotiate with FARC to no avail. Under Pastrana, he practically gave away the country to them and they continued to murder, rape, kidnap, and steal.
Disabuse yourself of the illusion that these are somehow leftist freedom fighters. They are NOT! FARC are nothing more than narco terrorists.

Under President Uribe FARC has been reduced from 16,000 to 8,000. He's also reduced crime in Colombia by over 70%. Colombians FINALLY live without the crippling anxiety that has plagued them for so many years thanks to Alvaro Uribe. How do I know this? Because I have family in Colombia and I have visited the country since he took over and the difference is beyond incredible.

Now, thanks to the arrogance...yes the arrogance and foolhardiness of Ingrid Betancourt who got herself kidnapped, Uribe is being pressured by both domestic and foreign politicians to compromise Colombian security and bow to whatever FARC demands in order to free Ms. Betancourt.

Now an entire country is expected to sacrifice its gains in stability and security for Ms. Betancourt who ...I will repeat it again and again..GOT HERSELF KIDNAPPED through her own arrogance and foolishness! Yeah, you better believe that pisses me off. There's over 600 innocent hostages. What about them? Do you think Sarkozy will give a rats ass over them or Colombia once Betancourt is liberated??? Or Chavez? Puhleeze! Ingrid Betancourt is the best bargaining chip the FARC have right now.

While I can understand the grief from the hostages families pressuring Uribe, President Uribe has an obligation with an entire nation of over 44 million not to sacrifice them over one citizen.

Oh and in case no one's heard, the "misunderstood freedom fighters" just attacked a police station murdering 3 cops and damaging neighboring civilian homes with grenades.

http://www.eltiempo.com/nacion/cali/2007-12-19/ARTICULO-WEB-NOTA_INTER...

Oh yeah, let's negotiate with these gems of humanity.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 08:32:

Nice job Catherine.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 19, 2007, 09:31:

Ok, now I'm fuming. This is so typical of those FARC criminals. They're demanding that Uribe resign as president if he wants the 45 hostages released. For those who don't read Spanish I'm sorry, but here's the latest released just 25 minutes ago.

La FARC se cree con autoridad para pedir renuncia de URIBE y cambio de gobierno

El líder armado Raúl Reyes dijo que la guerrilla está dispuesta a colaborar con un Ejecutivo pluralista
Las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia están dispuestas a colaborar si se instalara en Colombia un gobierno pluralista y democrático, dijo Raúl Reyes, segundo jefe de la guerrilla en una entrevista publicada por el diario argentino

El mismo rotativo difundió declaraciones del ministro del Interior, Carlos Holguín, en rechazo al pedido de desmilitarización de dos municipios para el canje de secuestrados por insurgentes presos.

Las FARC exigen la renuncia del presidente �lvaro Uribe, que "debe ser reemplazado por una coalición para integrar un gobierno pluralista, patriótico y democrático, que se comprometa con la verdadera paz", dijo Reyes en una entrevista hecha en la selva del sur de Colombia.

Reyes insistió en que "un gobierno así puede servir en Colombia, como un gobierno del Polo Democrático Alternativo", al que admitió como un partido socialdemócrata. Éste debería gobernar "con una fuerza política de masas con un programa que reivindique y dignifique al pueblo colombiano".

Las declaraciones formaron parte de una entrevista en la que Reyes afirmó que la guerrilla rechazará liberar en Venezuela a los 45 secuestrados, entre ellos la ex candidata presidencial Ingrid Betancourt.

Punto muerto. Clarín contactó a Holguín sobre la propuesta de despeje. "Nosotros no aceptamos de ninguna manera las presiones de las FARC ni el despeje de esos dos municipios, Pradera y Florida, ni aceptamos despeje militar en Colombia. Además si hay acuerdo los guerrilleros no podrán volver a delinquir", dijo el ministro del Interior colombiano.

Consultado si las negociaciones para la liberación de rehenes están en un punto muerto, el funcionario respondió: "Con estas condiciones que pone la guerrilla, sí, sin dudas".

Reyes insistió el domingo en reclamar a Uribe la desmilitarización de los municipios para llevar a cabo el canje humanitario de secuestrados por 500 guerrilleros presos. Sin embargo, Holguín dejó abierta la puerta a las gestiones del presidente Hugo Chávez.

"Hay que dejar actuar a Chávez y ver qué plan tiene. Él se va a reunir con Uribe y veremos", indicó. Por su parte, el canciller de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, expresó que se manejarán con prudencia. "En este proceso tan importante debemos tener mucha paciencia y confianza en que Dios nos va a ayudar a que se logre el acuerdo humanitario", indicó.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 10:44:

See, it just goes to show that those pieces of shit have no intention of negotiating in good faith. Now that they know they have no chance to win by force of arms, they are trying to backdoor it with the help of their accomplices Chavez and the traitor Cordova.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:09:

mmmm who is this catherine b mmmm?
billy b other name ? or wife ? says the same lies mmmmm

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:13:

Take off your mask, Uribe b !
I recognized you !

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:20:

If she sounds like me, it must be becuase she is incredibly intelligent and presient ;))

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:26:

"For over 40 years the Colombian government has tried to negotiate with FARC to no avail"
FALSE
"Under Pastrana, he practically gave away the country to them and they continued to murder, rape, kidnap, and steal"
FALSE
"FARC are nothing more than narco terrorists"
And URIBE, not ?
"He's also reduced crime in Colombia by over 70%"
FALSE etc...

How is it possible to argue with a person who writes two lies in each line ?
And what she says about Ingrid Betancourt is unworthy.
How can a human being think so ?

Catherine b, you give me an urgent and deep desire to puke on you.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:29:

Agua, you sound too retarded to bother arguing with.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:31:

I was wondering when his no less retarded brother was going to check in :))

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:35:

That's Top dog to you :)

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:38:

Yes cassi he must be paid by Buschuribe because an intelligent person could not sincerely defend his point of view. Sad.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Rikito says on Dec 19, 2007, 15:47:

Agua, you are in some serious intellectual danger when cassini77 agrees with you. Maybe you can both be prom dates.

I do feel for Catherine b, but I suggest that she stop fuming. Trying to reason with or for FARC will give you nothing but frustration. I am sure almost everyone in PBH would love to see the FARC crap end, but it will not happen anytime soon. I have always stood by my thesis that FARC will never give anyone back because if they do it is over for them. FARC will have no other cards to play.

Now that we are all excited that FARC and his butt boys; Chavez and Cordoba will see three hostages released just in time for Christmas...FARC turns on their dried shit for brains and says that they will release the three hostages when Uribe resigns from office.

This means that nada will happen folks. Uribe will not resign and the three hostages will not be freed. FARC only understands one thing...force. I would rather bet on cassini77 writing something mildly intelligent than on FARC releasing anyone at anytime.

Now who is going to explain all of this to the world’s greatest diplomatic warriors…the French! Ah…the poor French!

One more thing in case you find any of this difficult to fathom. FARC will not release the hostages. I would love to be wrong...I hope that I am on this...I pray that I am wrong on this.

It is not life that matters, but the journey.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 19, 2007, 16:50:

aguardiente and cassini77 want to puke and shit on my face, huh? Spoken like the true pro farc trash that you are. I'm delighted by your scatological vocabulary because you make my job so much easier :D Like Chavez, every time you open your mouths or type on your keyboard you prove yet again that you only possess 2 brain cells a piece ...and they're both playing hide and seek with each other.

You're incapable of refuting anything I've said with facts or engage in an intelligent exchange of ideas so you respond with all the wisdom of a rabid pig. That tends to happen to people when they're cornered with irrefutable facts and lack the maturity and intellect to accept it.

If you're going to say FALSE to whatever anyone posts here than you'd better back it up with facts and sources. You won't because you CAN'T :D

By all means please continue posting further eveidence of your subhuman vitriol and stunted emotional/intellectual growth. I love it when pro farcists and pro chavistas...oops..sorry...same thing drop their masks and show themselves for who and what they truly are.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 19, 2007, 17:33:

I think Catherine just gave the two resident morons a bitch slapping,jaja.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Colombiche says on Dec 19, 2007, 20:26:

"Now an entire country is expected to sacrifice its gains in stability and security for Ms. Betancourt who ...I will repeat it again and again..GOT HERSELF KIDNAPPED through her own arrogance and foolishness!"

Very eloquently said!!!!!

No me den trago extranjero, que es caro y no sabe a bueno.... (Rafael Godoy)

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Colombiche says on Dec 19, 2007, 20:29:

I am loving this heated discussion but let's try to keep it civil. Attack the point of view but not the poster.

No me den trago extranjero, que es caro y no sabe a bueno.... (Rafael Godoy)

0 funny, 0 helpful.

slguy says on Dec 19, 2007, 21:01:

I heard the French just lowered their internal security status from "hide" to "run".

Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Robert Jorge says on Dec 19, 2007, 21:45:

I still say the Colombian government, as a goodwill gesture, should announce the release of all FARC prisoners in the prison system. Of course, what will not be announced is that each FARC scum gets a chip implanted in their body prior to release. Give it a few days or weeks, and then drop 500 pounders on the lot of them. The collateral damage would be even more effective than the target being eliminated. I doubt the FARC scum are going to be playing tejo in Manizales. If we could confirm some of these vermin are among a large group of other vermin, MOAB their asses. Ahhhh, I feel better.

--"I believe in making the world safe for our children. But not for our children's children, because I don't think that children should be having sex." - Jack Handy

0 funny, 0 helpful.

msaucey says on Dec 19, 2007, 21:53:

Wow, I've been missing a good thread.....

Oh what will happen next!

I can barely breathe..

The trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed. - CS Lewis

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 19, 2007, 21:57:

Interesting.

Hey, Uribe's quite the man, the FARC probably don't like him too much, but they should just go to hell, trying to ruin beautiful Colombia.

That's enough intelligence from me for one day :)

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 19, 2007, 22:12:

yep; schtick to de futbol ;-)

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 19, 2007, 22:13:

I think it's still a Chavez ploy.. with the release of this one or three prisnoners.. now, they are in Chavez's hand.. He Will Use Them For His Own Good, and nothing else. NOTHING.

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 19, 2007, 22:16:

thanks doc, and goin_south, when clearminded and not all confounded with exam info and micro numbers crammed in my skull, i can very actively engage in intelligent debate, especially about Latin American politics, a subject in which I am fairly well-versed. but hey, I will never argue about sticking to futbol, something i would happily do for the rest of my life.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 19, 2007, 22:26:

well... maybe as long as there's also a fair amount of las colombianas involved, mir

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 19, 2007, 22:26:

we know, manINred... jus got to pick on a compadre in his moment of weakness

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 20, 2007, 01:05:

Oh I forgot something !

As well I will piss onto catherine b's crack !

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 20, 2007, 01:22:

It's fantastic.
When there is a post speaking of FARC all the simple-minded of PBH turn up like little lobotomised robots, repeating literally the borborygmi of their master Youri b.
How can you hold a dialogue with such people who have only words of hate, destruction, xenophobia, murder in the mouth ?
Look at this unconvincing catherine b: she discharges carts of insukts and untruths and thereafter asks for my sources ... She is not able to search by herself on Internet; the main origin of her information must be in the Palacio of Narino.
Catherine, billyb, rikito, go, go there to ask for the caresses of your owner.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Rikito says on Dec 20, 2007, 06:57:

Sorry agua...I can't repond yet. I have to wait until your mental patron saint, cassini77.

It is not life that matters, but the journey.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 20, 2007, 07:01:

Catherine is right, when you are the best the FARC ass kissers can send up, it makes our job just too easy.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 20, 2007, 07:19:

Keep it up aguardiente. Who's the one responding with insults? Who's the one who STILL can't provide a single source to support his point of view.

Your language or rather limited vocabulary perfectly reflects your stunted growth. You're what? In your forties? But verbally hav'nt been able to move beyond the scatological gibberish of a toddler. God, you're so sad and pathetic.

I only WISH I had access to el Palacio de Nariño! I would encourage Uribe on what a great job he's done. The fact remains President Uribe is the BEST president Colombia has had in at least 40 years. He has one of the highest approval ratings in the western hemisphere both within and outside Colombia after 5 years of his presidency... Duelale a quien le duela!!

At the moment his approval rating is at about 72% while Chavez is hovering beteen 56-59% within their respective countries! Ha! Chavez would give his left testicle right now for Uribe's approval ratings.

Everyone is allowed to their own points of view on this forum...that's what a democracy is in case you wer'nt familiar with such a concept, aguardiente. However, if you're unable to argue in an intelligent civil manner to prove your case and can only spew vulgarity and hate whenever another poster challenges your views than I believe the moderator should suspend your posts until such a time as you can formulate a coherent, intelligent sentence sans the scurrilousness and misogyny.
Grow up potty mouth!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 20, 2007, 11:23:

haha, well, my weaknesses are many I'm sure, but one of my strengths however is acknowledging my weaknesses.

And Catherine B, I applaud your words!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 20, 2007, 13:56:

Poor little manINred who needs to applaud stupid words !
It's not Little Big manINRed but little little thing in white.

catherine b does not know that Uribe has been elected by 26% of the colombians and Chavez by 47%
of the venezuelians; in this superb democracy of Colombia only 43% of the people have voted; in the dictatorship of Chavez 75% of the people have voted.

Catherine b has the right to admire someone who is a paraco and speaks like a fool escaped from a psychiatric hospital. It's democracy !

0 funny, 0 helpful.

lpdiver says on Dec 20, 2007, 14:10:

FARC frequently says that they are going to release the hostages. However, it is always based on some unreasonable absurd condition that everyone knows won't be met.

Don't hold your breath.

t

"cook some rice!"

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Rikito says on Dec 20, 2007, 15:49:

Agua, I just read your interesting post. Where did you read that President Uribe was elected with 26% of the vote? And who gives a rats ass about Chavez or anything he says. Whatever he says is a mostly untrue and is said for his own degenerate purpose.

If you have sources for your figures I woul enjoy reading them. It is important for a person to read and understand both viewpoints...especially when there is some intelligence writing.

It is not life that matters, but the journey.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 20, 2007, 21:33:

Too many sources to list but here's a few:

http://latino.msn.com/noticias/articles/ArticlePage.aspx?cp-documentid...

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0601/p08s01-comv.html

http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=124&subsecID=158&conten...

http://www.consulta.com.mx/interiores/14_entorno_int/ei_evaluacion_mad...

http://www.export.gov/articles/mom_colombia.asp

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006...

http://www.heritage.org/Research/LatinAmerica/bg1887.cfm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007...

http://ciponline.org/colombia/06elections.htm

http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2007/issue3/english/art1.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3214685.stm

http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?status=article...

http://www.electronic-economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10214719

http://www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias/site/artic/20061208/pags/20061...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

miamimike says on Dec 20, 2007, 21:33:

I doubt the Hostages and their Families could care less who negotiates their freedom! The fact they will be Free I would think is the Bottom Line and who negotiates it and to whom they are relaesed is secondary,,,

"Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gas? That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." -- Feb. 28, 2008 --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 20, 2007, 23:23:

I THINK SOMEONE NEEDS TO FORWARD THE IDEA ABOUT IMPLANTING THE CHIPS IN THE SKINS OF THE FARC PRISONERS AND LETTING THEM GO.. BACK TO THE JUNGLE AND ANNIHILATING THE WHOLE BUNCH...

SOMEONE NEEDS TO SEND THIS TO URIBE...
HE'S APPARENTLY GHOT HIS HEAD UP HIS ... *#%... ABOUT THE RE-ELECTION TO THINK SIMPLY ABOUT SUCH MATTERS...

I HAVE READ AND READ ABOUT SOLUTIONS/LACK OF SOLUTIONS TO THE ONGOING CIVIL WAR WITH LAS FARC NOW, FOR THREE YEARS AND RUNNING. .. AND, THIS IS THE ONLY VIABLE SOLUTION THAT I'VE HEARD HERE...

(and,... you can jus ask .. there's some smart fellows here...)

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 20, 2007, 23:41:

"It's not Little Big manINRed but little little thing in white"

Eso mijo

I'm not going to bother trying to understand what you are attempting to say. The fact that you cannot eloquantly add to this debate in a logical or coherent fashion and instead resort to insulting other people proves that you are in over your head.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 20, 2007, 23:51:

The fact of the matter is that Uribe got almost double the amount of the votes that the rest of the candidates got combined. This proves his legitimacy. He also has extremely high popularity rankings and support in Colombia, this fact is undeniable. If there was so much anti-Uribe sentiment, which clearly there is not in any significant quantity within Colombia, the population would not have been so passive. Quite frankly the election is a very good indication of the directions that Colombians want the country to go.

But I'm not going to waste any more words on Aguardiente, lest he get offended that someone should offer a voice of support to someone else's opinion.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 20, 2007, 23:53:

"FARC will show there compassion y value for human life when President Uribe has them vertually exterminated. As this is the only way to communicate with them.
Viva Uribe!"

Absolutely correct Docwilliam. I see absolutely no indication that the FARC has any respect for human life, except when it suits them, which in itself indicates inherent self-interest as opposed to said respect.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 00:18:

Colombian presidential election, 2006:
Uribe: 62.20% of the total valid votes (7,363,421 of 11,838,421)
Total valid votes: 11,838,421 of 26,731,700 registered voters

Uribe: 7,363,421 of 26,731,700 = 27,5 % of the registered voters

Venezuelan presidential election, 2006:
Chavez: 62,84% of the total votes (7,309,080 of 11,790,397)
Total votes: 11,790,397 of 15,784,777 registered voters

Chavez: 7,309,080 of 15,784,777 = 46.3% of the registered voters

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 00:20:

So Chavez is best elected than Uribe.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 00:24:

Desde el principio lo hemos dicho: este gobierno se sostiene en mentiras, disfrazadas con diferentes denominaciones (falsos positivos, razones de Estado, encuestas de Infamer Gallup, cifras del DANE, comunicados de Palacio, terrorismo vestido de civil, versiones a título personal, sofismas de José Obdulio, columnas de Fernando Londoño, etc.)

Y a las verdades que salen, con pruebas incluidas, les huye de esta manera Uribe Vélez:

- Al expediente de hace 23 años del magnicidio de Rodrigo Lara Bonilla, donde éste le declara a su hermana y a varios periodistas, entre ellos Guillermo Cano, que el narcotráfico estaba infiltrando todos los estamentos de la sociedad y que evidencia de ésto era que la familia Uribe Vélez estaba vinculada en negocios con las mafias.

- El siniestro José Obdulio y el jefe de prensa, César Mauricio Velásquez, le advirtieron a Uribe no dar declaraciones sobre los hechos relatados en este expediente, solicitud presentada por el periodista Gerardo Reyes de El Nuevo Herald, a su vez que le ocultaron sistemáticamente esta información a Rodrigo Lara Restrepo, ex Zar Anticorrupción.

- Todos los helicópteros sospechosos que han aparecido en la historia de Alvaro Uribe Vélez (el que el día de su muerte rescató a Alberto Uribe Sierra, de propiedad de Pablo Escobar; el incautado en el laboratorio de coca Tranquilandia en 1984, de propiedad de Alberto Uribe Sierra; el de la Gobernación de Antioquia, que sobrevoló el corregimiento de El Aro, cuando los paramilitares masacraron a más de 150 pobladores en 1996; el que transportaba a Pedro Juan Moreno y su hijo y que sufrió un extraño accidente, donde ambos murieron, siniestro que aún no tiene una clara respuesta)

- La interceptación al teléfono del propio Alvaro Uribe en el Palacio de Nariño, donde quedó registrada la soez conversación con Luis Fernando Herrera "La Mechuda", fue promovida por las órdenes del mismo Uribe. ¿O si no entonces qué significa la frase "...y ojalá me graben esta llamada"?

- Los vínculos de la familia de José Obdulio Gaviria con los perpetradores del crimen de Guillermo Cano, publicados en la última edición de El Espectador (semana del 16 al 22 de diciembre de 2007).

En cambio, para nosotros las cosas están muy claras: en Colombia se consolidó el Estado soñado por Pablo Escobar Gaviria, capo de capos, al lograr que el país entero, la mayoría informada, los adeptos de la reeligión, erigieran como su ídolo y aplaudieran a ALVARO URIBE VÉLEZ como el Salvador de la Patria.

http://reeligion.blogspot.com/

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 21, 2007, 00:33:

mIR
.... Aguardiente...es quiza...Col_Mike...

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 21, 2007, 00:34:

como esta? en Valledupar, mike?

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 01:40:

La renuncia del embajador de Colombia en Reino Unido es otro portazo al presidente Alvaro Uribe
En menos de dos semanas, dos importantes funcionarios del gobierno renunciaron por las malas noticias que comprometen a la familia del Presidente de la República y a su asesor de confianza, José Obdulio Gaviria.
Fecha: 12/20/2007 -

http://www.semana.com/wf_InfoArticulo.aspx?idArt=108470

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Rikito says on Dec 21, 2007, 05:10:

So agua...you fabricated your first set of stats which means that you lied and lost all credibility to be considered serious in the future.

I'll stick with catherine b.

It is not life that matters, but the journey.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 21, 2007, 06:21:

Agua is Cassini.

"I THINK SOMEONE NEEDS TO FORWARD THE IDEA ABOUT IMPLANTING THE CHIPS IN THE SKINS OF THE FARC PRISONERS AND LETTING THEM GO"

That's what they did with the son of "EL Mejicano", one of the bosses of the Medellin Cartel, when they released him from jail (for landing a plane without a flight plan) and tracked him to his dad's hideout, were they killed him

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 06:34:

And Rikito is catherine b who is billyb who is Youri b.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 21, 2007, 08:58:

HAHAHAHA!! I love it! Beautiful! Hee hee hee! I provide a plethora of various sources from different countries and the best source aguamiente can come up with is from an anti-Uribe blog whose owner states as follows on his own blog:

"¿Quién soy?Minoria desinformada
Soy la minoría desinformada porque no recurro a los medios de comunicación por excelencia (entiéndase Canal RCN, Caracol TV, El Tiempo, la W), donde la mayoría de colombianos se mantienen actualizados sobre la realidad del país. En ese caso, prefiero seguir desinformada, porque entiendo mejor lo que le ocurre a Colombia."

So what are these accusations leveled at Uribe now? That his father may have possibly owned a helicopter that was used by Escobar? NEWSFLASH: At one time or another just about EVERYONE in Medellin had some type of relationship with Escobar if not from greed than from fear. What do you suggest we do? Jail the entire city of Medellin??
That the older brother of one of his cabinet members may have been involved in the murder of Guillermo Cano?

Since when is anyone guilty of who were the possible friends or acquantances of their father? Since when is anyone guilty over the possible criminal actions of a sibling of another politician. Puhleeze!

Following that logic, almost nobody would be elected in ANY country if a politician is guilty of what a relative does or the relatives of members of his cabinet.

So what if Chavez won his election by a slightly higher margin than Uribe? It still does'nt change the FACT that Uribe still won democratically AND it was a landslide victory!

P.S. For those who may be interested to know, the current vice-president of Venezuela Jorge Rodriguez was previous to Tibisay Lucena, the president of the CNE (Consejo Nacional Electoral) of Venezuela. Yup, that inspires a great deal of confidence in the independence and honesty of the body counting and overseeing of the votes in Venezuela.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 21, 2007, 10:25:

"Desde el principio lo hemos dicho: este gobierno se sostiene en mentiras, disfrazadas con diferentes denominaciones "

Who's 'nosotros'? You and the anti-Uribe blog? Sorry, that counts as neither a primary nor even secondary source of legitimate information. I can copy and paste opinionated blogs relevant to my claims too, that doesn't mean to say that the information has any degree of credibility.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 21, 2007, 10:29:

"So what if Chavez won his election by a slightly higher margin than Uribe? It still does'nt change the FACT that Uribe still won democratically AND it was a landslide victory!"

Exactly. Chavez's victory was no more legitimate than Uribe's. Colombia as a state clearly does not have the same capacity to extend citizenship rights to the entire population that Venezuela does. Colombia has a much bigger marginalized segment of the population, not only because its population is 4 times bigger than Venezuela's (not to mention much more geographically diverse and spread-out) but also because of LAS FARC who continually undermine the legitimacy and authority of the state in vast areas of the country. Uribe's efforts are focused on eliminating las FARC and the various groups that exacerbate the civil war in one way or another.

Quite frankly, any president elected in Colombia who didn't have that as a prime objective would have a questionable mandate.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 21, 2007, 10:30:

goin_south, which one was col_mike?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Robert Jorge says on Dec 21, 2007, 11:07:

Chavez may have been more legit than Uribe. President Carter observed and endorsed the whole deal when Chavez won! Jajajajajajaaja

--"I believe in making the world safe for our children. But not for our children's children, because I don't think that children should be having sex." - Jack Handy

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Desideria (Moderator) says on Dec 21, 2007, 11:13:

None of them. Aguardiente=cassini

"I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them."-President George W. Bush

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Desideria (Moderator) says on Dec 21, 2007, 11:17:

The hostages that are going to be liberated are presumably already on their way into Venezuela. It's programmed to take place in Venezuelan Amazonas on the 23rd-24the December. I'm holding my breath....

"I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them."-President George W. Bush

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 11:59:

If you have read newspapers these last days, the problem with Uribe is not this of his relatives but the fact that he has delibarately hidden information about this.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 12:07:

And if I were an Uribophilist I should begin to ask me if the very bad image of Colombia in foreign countries has more to do with Uribe than with FARC. I do not speek only for Europa. Look at the other countries of South America. Even USA foreign politic begins to get differences with the intransigent positions of Uribe.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

slguy says on Dec 21, 2007, 12:27:

"I do not speek only for Europa"

only for europa? pretty inflated sense of your own value, it seems to me.

I'm pretty sure the european community is VASTLY relieved that you don't speak for them, period.

Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 21, 2007, 12:35:

I am shaking like a french soldier, knowing that he's not only speaking for Europa, jaja.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 21, 2007, 12:51:

Colombia has NEVER had a stellar reputation in the rest of the world for over 40 years. LOL.
Who are these other South American "countries" that criticize Uribe? Chavez? That's a laugh. The Kirchners? LOL. Evo Morales? The lapdogs of Chavez all of them. Or perhaps that solitary voice from Central America, Ortega? Yeah, the opinion of a pederast who just lost....AGAIN San Andres, Providencia, y Santa Catalina to Colombia before the Hague really counts for much.

Europe and the USA you claim have a "bad image" of Uribe. These are some elements within these countries and not all. And who exactly are those elements?
In the USA, there are some members within the democratic party that sabotage Uribe for the SOLE and petty purpose to oppose a Bush ally. These are irresponsible officials who completely disregard the situation in Colombia merely to "get at" Bush. Pure pettiness, nothing else. They don't care about Colombia. They'd be better served by opposing the war in Iraq, but that's a different topic.

As for Europe. For those here who are unaware there is an organization...among others...known as Colombia Solidarity that continually pressures and writes to European governments smearing Uribe and presenting a false image of the FARC as "leftist freedom fighters" rather than the narco terrorists and murderers which they truly are. These organizations should rename themselves FARC Solidarity instead as their members are composed primarily if not entirely of marxist idealogues who of course are going to be sympathetic to their farc brothers and not the Colombian people.
I strongly encourage Colombians and those who SINCERELY care about the future of Colombia to likewise write to your congressmen and women and EU leaders as well to present a more accurate account of the history of FARC and the advances achieved by President Uribe.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 21, 2007, 13:29:

"I should begin to ask me if the very bad image of Colombia in foreign countries has more to do with Uribe than with FARC"

hahaha. Are you serious??? that's funny. No, most people outside of those who have links to Colombia and those who are particularly aware of the political world don't even know who Uribe is. No, but they know who the FARC is, they know who has the biggest reputation for drug smuggling in the world. No, not Uribe, yes, the FARC, and the cartels and armed illegal movements that have plagued Colombia since the 70s, and the civil violence that has plagued the country since independence.

No Aguardiente, you truly are out to lunch if you believe for a second that Colombia's terrible reputation worldwide stems from Uribe. The horrible images that people have of Colombia is of guerrillas kidnapping people, not Uribe being president.

That being said, there was some international concern over the way in which the AUC demobilized, and how much they ended up being accountable for human rights abuses, which went through lengthy legislative review in the Colombian congress. To expect the common European to understand or care about that is laughable.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 21, 2007, 17:17:

ManINwhite you are entirely out; here most people do not know the FARC but they know the problem of drug and they do not make differences between colombian politicians; for them it is the politic system that is rotten and Uribe is considered as a corrupted one.

Catherine b, you are more and more attractive: you speak from Ortega as a "pederast".
I identify in your remark the old visage of intolerance, inquisition, refusal of difference.

Obviously you are an unexciting and useless person and as long as there will be in front of them persons like you FARC will find a favorable ground to prosper.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

catherine b says on Dec 21, 2007, 18:02:

Again this aguamiente leaves unintellible comments. Why am I not surprised that a pro farcist is also pro pederast? Although refering to Ortega as a pederast was a misnomer on my part, as it was his stepdaughter (not a male child) who accused him of rape.

I accept differences. I do NOT accept violent criminals especially those who prey on the most defenseless members of society.

So if my unapologetic contempt for murderers, kidnappers, child molesters and other similar forms of human trash makes me "unexciting and useless" in your eyes I take that as the highest compliment.

Apropos, I am useful enough to challenge your lies and asinine comments :D

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 21, 2007, 18:37:

"ManINwhite you are entirely out; here most people do not know the FARC but they know the problem of drug and they do not make differences between colombian politicians; for them it is the politic system that is rotten and Uribe is considered as a corrupted one. "

Rubbish, to think you accurately represent the average European mind is laughable and insulting to my family and every european i know. So no, your stereotypes certainly do not resound throughout Europe. And guess what, that political corruption stereotype you bleat on about is certainly not specific to Colombia, it is specific to developing nations in latin america, the middle east, and asia. Mexico these days is singled out in terms of corruption more than COlombia.

Guaro, to waste more words on you, the bad image of Colombia is DRUGS and KIDNAPPINGS. What part of that don't you understand? Europeans don't care about the government, but they certainly care about the drug runners (FARC/other armed illegal groups and cartels) and kidnappings (guerrilla groups).

Corruption above and beyond corruption inherent in ANY political administration is not all that obvious in the Uribe adminstration, whereas Colombia's pressing problem of drugs, crime and kidnapping certainly is.

"How is it possible to argue with a person who writes two lies in each line ?"
-Aguardiente

haha, ironic. kill some more cells with that vile liquid you drink, perhaps then you can puke on your computer and succeed in figuratively puking on catherine b.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Sam Salmon says on Dec 21, 2007, 21:04:

Ortega=human filth worthy only of a long slow painful death.

' a la orden!'

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 22, 2007, 01:28:

drug runners = only FARCS ?

Read: even the "official" newspapers of Colombia speak of paramilitaries, policemen, militaries, non political networks, links of Uribe, etc.

The whole Colombia is concerned, not only the FARC.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 22, 2007, 01:53:

In March 1998, when she was 30 years old, Zoilamerica Narvaez accused Ortega of raping her repeatedly over several years, beginning when she was 11 years old.
In 2001, a judge dismissed charges that Daniel Ortega had raped his stepdaughter on the ground that the statute of limitations had run out.
I have not read that Zoilamerica Narvaez had appealed the ruling as she said she would do.
What seemed to me strange is that, in the most cases of rape against stepdaughters, the children begin to speak when they are 18 - 21 years old. Narvaez spoke when she was 30 ...

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Rikito says on Dec 22, 2007, 05:42:

agua, and people do respond to you it is mostly out of suprise or disrespect of your comments. I would ays that 99.5% of the people in here have something worthwhile to say...pro and con of the subject. Many disagree with me and I can accept that becasue they are least respectful and sometiimes provide me with valuable information that I had not thought ofbefore.

It is not life that matters, but the journey.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

aguardiente says on Dec 22, 2007, 07:55:

Adieu cruel world.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

billyb says on Dec 22, 2007, 22:22:

It is a cruel world, if you happen to be french ;))

0 funny, 0 helpful.

Cerealkiller says on Dec 23, 2007, 02:06:

This is the most retarded thread I've read in months. Good sport.

Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives -John Stuart Mill

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Dec 25, 2007, 04:58:

Did they ever really let this lady 'go free' yet?

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Dec 28, 2007, 04:36:

Catherine b...."In the USA, there are some members within the democratic party that sabotage Uribe for the SOLE and petty purpose to oppose a Bush ally."

WRONG!!!. The almost 5 billion dollars the US has sent in military aid since 2000 has had horrendous results in Colombia. It has paid for military and para-military human rights abuses including massacres, disappearances, kidnapping, and threats of social justice and labor activists and their families. As long as the Colombian government spends their resources fighting, killing, and torturing the Colombian people the solidarity movement in the US should demand an end to all aid ­ both military and “humanitarian� ­ to Colombia. It is critical that we change
our policy with Colombia - This money has been spent
supporting a brutal right wing government which uses death squads to kill &
intimidate trade unionists, human rights workers & peasants. This is why I and many others support an end to US support for the Uribe government. Until Colombia can clean up it's own mess, don't expect the rest of the world to keep a sympethetic ear. NO MAS!

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Dec 28, 2007, 04:45:

We'll see how history judges the Democrats. Harry tells us that the war is lost. And the Democrats try to throw as much shit against the wall as they can to see what will stick. There has to be more substance to an effective political strategy than hate Bush.

I agree with b.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Dec 28, 2007, 04:59:

tomtom & catherine b, Please explain to me what YOU want the USA to do for Colombia. What "support" do you think is appropriate? Money? Trade? Advice? Well Wishes?

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Dec 28, 2007, 05:13:

If you take a no support stance until any particular country cleans up its own mess, you would never support anything. There are always nits to be picked. And the US has not cleaned up its own mess.

Supporting a popular, democratically-elected leader is a good start toward stability. Any popular, democratically-elected leader will have his flaws.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Dec 28, 2007, 12:29:

Again tomtom, please define support. Also, I hardly consider human rights violations, murder for hire, kidnapping and no reduction in cocaine production/exportation "nits to pick".

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Dec 28, 2007, 12:33:

I frankly don't know enough to define support.

You can make those exact statements about the US as well. There are horrors in the world, and there always will be. Is that an excuse to do nothing?

0 funny, 0 helpful.

slguy says on Dec 28, 2007, 14:47:

"The almost 5 billion dollars the US has sent in military aid since 2000 has had horrendous results in Colombia. It has paid for military and para-military human rights abuses including massacres, disappearances, kidnapping, and threats of social justice and labor activists and their families. As long as the Colombian government spends their resources fighting, killing, and torturing the Colombian people the solidarity movement in the US should demand an end to all aid ­ both military and “humanitarian��? ­ to Colombia. It is critical that we change"

I sure would like to see evidence of these claims. Unless anyone can provide a clear money trail, this kind of talk is just yapping. Everyone's entitled to yap to their heart's content, of course, but don't expect rational minds to support such blather absent anything more substantive than an entertaining rant.

Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Dec 28, 2007, 15:12:

I only have time to reference "evidence" now, more to follow.

http://www.colombiajournal.org/colombia268.htm

In the past 20 years, more than 3,000 Colombian unionists have been assassinated. And of the 144 unionists killed worldwide last year, 78 were Colombian—eight more than the previous year. According to the International Confederation of Trade Unions (ICFTU), there were 1,165 documented murders of Colombian trade union members between 1994 and 2006. However, the state has convicted the perpetrators in only 14 of these cases—an impunity rate of over 95 percent.

A review of the numbers shows that the ratio of labor leaders killed relative to the number of unionized workers in Colombia is higher under the Uribe government than it was during the 1990s. Last year, one out of every 6,800 union members was assassinated. This rate of extermination is significantly higher than during the mid-1990s when an average of one out of every 8,100 unionists was killed. Because the level of unionization in Colombia has declined to only four percent of the workforce, the percentage of unionists being killed today is markedly higher than a decade ago.

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Dec 28, 2007, 15:40:

I am damn sorry about the union problem. There were a few union problems in the US as well. John D. Rockefeller ordered mine massacres and hired Pinkerton agents to beat the fuck out of people. This is part of the evolution of the union movement in Colombia. It has absolutely no bearing upon US aid to Colombia.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

manINred says on Dec 29, 2007, 11:07:

Very well said tomtom33 and slguy.

Well, unions are a great thing, but can be terrible at the same time. They almost bankrupted Britain in the 70s until Thatcher and her iron hand came down hard upon them. I find that in Canada (Toronto) they are a burden on the normal citizen who are forced to pay higher taxes to pay garbage men, bus drivers and rec workers triple the market equilibrium price of what they would be earning. Hotshots with masters degrees don't even earn as much in the first few years of their work. In my case, as a part of a union (part-time), I earn less than the non-unionized employees, a fat lot of good it does me!

0 funny, 0 helpful.

slguy says on Dec 29, 2007, 12:30:

and your point, elbee2? I'm waiting for the documentation on how the US is paying for this. I never said that being a union organizer isn't a dangerous profession in Colombia- only that your BS claims about Plan Colombia paying for it are both irresponsible and indicative of a certain...dislocation from reality.

Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Jan 1, 2008, 01:01:

First of all I'm not arguing a case for unions, that's a completely different subject . This is about human rights violations (and the murder of unionists is just one example) in Colombia that Uribe's amdinistration turns a blind eye to. The fact that these thugs are not attempted to be tracked and prosecuted by the Colombian government sends a pretty blatant message and some could argue it is akin to having Uribe's blessing.

“Colombia has a long and ugly history of killing trade unionists, and a dismal record when it comes to bringing their killers to justice,�? said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch. “To make the country safe for unions, the authorities must ensure these cases are vigorously investigated and prosecuted.�?

Twenty-six trade unionists, including five union leaders, have been killed in Colombia this year, according to Colombia’s largest labor federation, the Unitary Headquarters for Workers (Central Unitaria de Trabajadores). The National Labor School (Escuela Nacional Sindical), a prominent labor rights group in Colombia, has recorded more than 2,500 killings of trade unionists since 1986. Approximately 98 percent of these killings have never been solved.

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/11/07/colomb17269.htm

So slguy, if the US is giving money to a country that supports this behavior within it's own borders, it is in essence, "paying" indirectly for it to continue. That is in fact reality and you can call it BS if you so desire.

So here is my question to you.....tell me how Plan Colombia has succeeded in your opinion?

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Jan 1, 2008, 01:28:

Here is another "irresponsible and dislocated from reality" persons opinion of Uribe's government....Oh, and by the way, he's an award winning Colombian journalist.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/18/opinion/edmorris.php

http://hrw.org/audio/2007/english/defenders/colomb16822.htm

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Jan 1, 2008, 02:06:

Yet another person who's lost touch with reality.... this guy actually froze the payment of money to Colombia over concerns about Uribe's & Montoya's connection to paramilitary groups, but he was just being irresponsible...right slguy?

“I have withheld the release of those funds because I – and other Members of Congress – are concerned about reports of paramilitary infiltration of the Colombian government and military, as well as extrajudicial executions by the military. These reports are not new, but more information has recently surfaced. There are even reports that the chief of the Army, General Montoya, commanded troops who collaborated with paramilitaries. I do not know if these reports are accurate, but we have an obligation to assure ourselves that they are not. We do not want our aid to go to anyone with links to paramilitaries. Uncovering the truth is important, and so is acting on the truth.

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200705/050207c.html

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Jan 1, 2008, 02:19:

Really, this is just too easy! Shall I go on?

"The paramilitaries have taken control of a good part of the (Uribe) administration," former President Cesar Gaviria, leader of the opposition Liberal Party, told reporters last month.

The scandal began early this year when two political parties that support the conservative Uribe -- the Bush administration's closest ally in South America -- expelled five of their congressional candidates for ties to right-wing paramilitary militias, which have killed tens of thousands of civilians and run drug-trafficking networks.

But the affair exploded last month after the Supreme Court ordered the arrest of three legislators and a former congresswoman -- all Uribe allies -- for being part of a paramilitary group that brutally massacred 16 villagers in 2000 using rocks and machetes, a trademark paramilitary method of murder.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/12/16/MNGM8N0...

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Jan 1, 2008, 02:22:

Pat Leahy is an example of Democrats opposing anything proposed by the Bush administration. That opposition, of course, is the duty of the party who does not hold the White House. However, even Leahy claims no nexus between Plan Colombia and any alleged connection between Uribe and the paras.

Leahy is merely engaging in the age-old practice of trying to control behavior with purse strings. I do not believe in the use of blackmail.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Jan 1, 2008, 03:44:

UMMMMMMMMM.... it Bill Clinton who proposed Plan Colombia and I'm pretty sure he's a Democrat. Your statement about being partisan just for the sake of "duty" is exactly why Republicans no longer control the Senate and soon will not hold the Whitehouse. Americans (Republicans and Democrats) are sick and tired of partisan politics.

http://democrats.senate.gov/journal/entry.cfm?id=289655&

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Jan 1, 2008, 04:26:

And Bill Clinton supported the war in Iraq. Of course now he says he didn't. It doesn't matter who started what. It only matters what the administration in power supports.

Partisanship, my friend, forms the basis of the American system. One party in opposition. That promotes debate and the exchange of ideas. Some parts of this system have been twisted beyond all recognition. But that is what politicians do. And politicians are only a reflection of us.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Jan 1, 2008, 05:31:

a politician basicly... begins life, as a good man or woman... but, soon has a thousand people pulling at him/her from every direction...with every different thought process imaginable.... and then,... they begin 'selling out'. I'm talking about your basic LOCAL politician... before he becomes REALLY LOCO ;-)

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

tomtom33 says on Jan 1, 2008, 06:41:

Selling out is a whole other deal. It starts with campaign contributions. It can end up like the gentleman from Louisiana. Or is that gentlemen? You really can't forget the Kingfish.

Lest anyone think that I'm picking on Louisiana, the boys from Illinois take a back seat to no one.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

slguy says on Jan 1, 2008, 07:14:

What you have quoted above,elbee, in case you hadn't noticed, are reactions by oppostion political parties to Bush and Uribe - all of them with significant disclamiers...."it appears..."..."I do not know if these reports are accurate..."

It IS pretty easy to print unsubstantiated poltical posturing, ellbee. anyone can do that. What I asked for is evidence of a money trail to support your claim that Plan Colombia dollars are used to support the paras, as you claimed in your wild-eyed original rant.

I'm still waiting.

Before you throw me out, make sure I pay my bar tab

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Jan 1, 2008, 07:15:

ja! I'm too young to remember; before my time.
I didn't even know Louisiana existed.
I thought is was something in a store...jajj
La Purchase.

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

goin_south says on Jan 1, 2008, 07:15:

boys from Illinois...
Now, your pickn on me an Honest Abe...jaj

Ciao! Gustav.

0 funny, 0 helpful.

ellbee2 says on Jan 1, 2008, 11:07:

OK, slguy. It really won't matter what I offer up to you as support for what I believe is a failed policy in Colombia. You will discount my opinion and that of others as "unsubstantiated political posturing" because it doesn't jive with what you believe. I can respect that you have a differing opinion and welcome your point of view on the results of Plan Colombia. As a tax paying American citizen it is my right and responsibility to voice my opinion about where my hard earned tax dollars are spent.

Although I can not provide you with a detailed "money trail" of Plan Colombia money to the Paras, it is my opinion that if it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck and looks like a duck...it's probably a duck. Are you denying that there is a history of the Colombian government being in cahoots with paramilitary groups and that the possibility that a connection with the current administration still exists? I want answers to these questions before we continue to sign a blank check to Colombia.

So again, I ask you. Do you feel Plan Colombia has ben a success? Your obviously an intelligent guy, so make an intellligent argument for continuing the monetary support for a country that tolerates human rights violations. Or convince me they are not happening under Uribes watch.

"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going because you might not get there." Yogi Berra

0 funny, 0 helpful.

slguy says on Jan 1, 2008, 12:44:

Is there a country on earth that has zero human rights abuses - a country that internal strife, including a bunch of cowardly "rebels" - where no one reacts? Where no reactions occur that are outside the pale? Not to my knowledge.

For example- Israel's treatment of the Palesti