pbh home > > post  

Pst! Don't go to the easy 7 second sign up. Existing users: sign in.

poorbuthappy home  

all forums, active | friendly talkzone, travel tips, visa & paperwork, renting, selling & meetups, politics & the war, espanol

10 bombas de alta tecnología cayeron en la base de las FARC

3/21/2008

El ataque al campamento de las FARC en territorio ecuatoriano provocó un revuelo a escala internacional, no solo por el hecho de que se violó la soberanía ecuatoriana, tal como lo reconoció la Organización de Estados Americanos , sino por la magnitud del bombardeo.

El pasado 6 de marzo, expertos en armamento de la Fuerza Aérea Ecuatoriana (FAE) iniciaron un peritaje de lo ocurrido en Angostura, donde falleció el segundo de las FARC, ‘Raúl Reyes’. Su objetivo era clarificar cómo se produjo el bombardeo, el armamento utilizado y los daños causados.

De acuerdo con el informe de los peritos, se utilizaron 10 bombas GBU 12 Paveway II de 500 libras, que dejaron cráteres de 2,40 metros de diámetro por 1,80 metros de profundidad.

Según las especificaciones del fabricante de la bomba GBU 12, Texas Instruments, este explosivo puede ser guiado por láser, GPS o tecnología intersensorial (INS). Además, el informe de la FAE señala que se encontraron vainillas de proyectiles 0,50 en el sector sur del campamento, “que fueron disparadas por ametralladoras emplazadas en helicópteros, que brindaron la seguridad del personal que realizó la infiltración�.

Este tipo de bomba fue muy usado durante la ‘Operación Tormenta del Desierto’, en Irak.

La mayoría de las bombas cayó en el área de dormitorios y de adoctrinamiento del campamento. Las zonas de lavandería y entrenamiento quedaron intactas.

La Guía de Identificación de Armamento de la Organización del Tratado del Atlántico del Norte (OTAN) señala que las bombas GBU 12 solamente pueden ser transportadas por aviones A7, A10, B52, F111, F117, F15, F16, F/A 18 C/D, F14 y A6.

El Ministerio de Defensa colombiano aseguró que en el operativo ‘Fénix’ se usaron aviones Súper Tucano. No obstante, según la OTAN, estas naves no se incluyen entre las que pueden llevar bombas GBU 12, como las empleadas en el ataque a la base irregular.
En diciembre del 2006, Colombia concretó la compra de 25 aviones Súper Tucano a la empresa Embraer, fabricante de este tipo de aeronaves, como parte del proceso de modernización de su Fuerza Aérea.

Datos de fabricación de los aviones A-29B Súper Tucano señalan que la aeronave está dotada con un motor turbohélice, controlado por un sistema digital integrado. Puede llevar armas convencionales e inteligentes; por ejemplo, el misil Python III, la bomba guiada por láser (LGB) Griffin, o toda la familia de bombas Mk-82.

Además, puede cargar ametralladoras 0,50 dentro de las alas, como los aviones de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.

En su informe, la FAE también descartó de manera definitiva que en el ataque se hayan usado aviones Kfir, que forman parte de las filas colombianas.

Ayer, la Fuerza Aérea Colombiana (FAC) le dijo a este Diario, a través de su oficina de prensa, que no era posible dar ningún detalle del armamento utilizado en el operativo del 1 de marzo, a menos que la FAE lo solicite por los canales oficiales. Por el momento, la comunicación entre las dos fuerzas está en suspenso, luego de que el ministro de Defensa ecuatoriano, Wellington Sandoval, pidiera que se termine el convenio de la Comisión Binacional de Frontera (Combifron). De producirse este requerimiento, explicó la Fuerza Aérea colombiana , se proporcionará el mismo informe sobre el armamento y todo el equipo militar utilizado en la Operación Fénix, que ya fue entregado al secretario general de la OEA, José Miguel Insulza, la semana anterior, durante su visita a Colombia.

Mientras tanto, la FAE seguirá investigando a fin de determinar qué tipo de avión fue el utilizado para bombardear el campamento de las FARC, que dejó 26 persona muertas. Por ello, incluso se ha mantenido la reserva en cuanto al contenido del informe de la Fuerza Aérea, según informó una alta fuente del Ministerio de Defensa ecuatoriano.

Además, de acuerdo con datos de Inteligencia Naval, un avión HC-130 despegó desde el FOl de Base de Manta, a las 19:00 del viernes 29 de febrero y regresó a las 16:30 del día siguiente. Lamentablemente se desconoce el rumbo que tomó esta aeronave de EE.UU., aunque según las autoridades de la base militar, se realizó una labor de control rutinario a las costas ecuatorianas.

El HC-130 es la versión mejorada de combate y rescate del avión de transporte C-130. Su misión principal es proveer combustible en el aire a helicópteros de rescate, aunque también sirve como arma de combate y de transporte de personal y de otras aeronaves.

Los aviones HC-130 suelen volar de noche, a bajo nivel y lanzar todo tipo de operaciones de reabastecimiento. Sus pilotos usan visores nocturnos.

http://www2.elcomercio.com/noticiaEC.asp?id_noticia=178869&id_seccion=...

By buggy on Mar 21, 15:16 in Politics & the war. AddThis Social Bookmark Button


romy says on Mar 24, 15:50:

Did U.S. Mercenaries Bomb the FARC Encampment in Ecuador?
By Tom Burghardt
Global Research, March 23, 2008

As diplomatic and military fallout from the March 1 Colombian raid into Ecuador escalate regional tensions, allegations from Ecuadorean sources link the unprovoked attack to the U.S. Manta airbase and charge the American mercenary firm DynCorp with piloting the planes that killed FARC commander Raúl Reyes and 24 others.

According to investigative journalist Kintto Lucas,

A high-level Ecuadorean military officer, who preferred to remain anonymous, told IPS that “a large proportion of senior officers� in Ecuador share “the conviction that the United States was an accomplice in the attack� launched Mar. 1 by the Colombian military on a FARC…camp in Ecuador, near the Colombian border.

“Since Plan Colombia was launched in 2000, a strategic alliance between the United States and Colombia has taken shape, first to combat the insurgents and later to involve neighbouring countries in that war,� said the officer. “What is happening today is a consequence of that.� (�Ecuador: Manta Air Base Tied to Colombian Raid on FARC Camp,� Inter Press Service, March 21, 2008)



Ecuadorean Defense Minister Wellington Sandoval said an investigation into whether the Manta airbase was used in the attack should be carried out by Ecuador’s armed forces. According to the leasing agreement, the Manta base can only be used for counternarcotics operations.

While U.S. Ambassador Linda Jewell assured Ecuadorean Foreign Minister María Isabel Salvador that the planes at Manta “were not involved in any way,� the military source told the IPS reporter that “the technology used, first to locate the target, in other words the camp, and later to attack it, was from the United States.�

Sandoval had earlier said that “equipment that the Latin American armed forces do not have� was used in the Mar. 1 bombing, according to Lucas.

Commenting on the tactical modalities employed in the raid, Sandoval said,

“They dropped around five ’smart bombs’,� the kind used by the United States in the First Gulf War (1991), “with impressive precision and a margin of error of just one metre, at night, from planes travelling at high speeds,� said the minister.

The military source said that “an attack with smart bombs requires pilots who have experience in such operations, which means U.S. pilots. That’s why I think they did the job and later told the Colombians ‘now go in and find the bodies’, which is when Colombian helicopters and troops showed up� at the site of the raid.

The U.S. role in the raid could have been even greater. The officer claimed that the bombing raid was actually led by “U.S. pilots, possibly from DynCorp.� While demonstrable evidence for these explosive charges has yet to surface, the statements by the Ecuadorean officer seem plausible, particularly when one considers the role played by American military- and mercenary personnel in coordinating Plan Colombia.

Claiming that the aircraft “took off from the Tres Esquinas air base in the southern Colombian department of Caquetá,� the officer went on to describe how “the planes used to fumigate coca crops or to attack the guerrillas are piloted by serving members of the U.S. military or (former) military men at the service of companies like DynCorp.�

More than $5.5 billion dollars has been poured into the region by the United States since 2000, allegedly for “counternarcotics operations.� A key strategic goal of America’s “war on drugs� is to take the “battle� to the source–coca growing, processing and exporting Andean nations, and DynCorp has been a major beneficiary of U.S. largess in the area.

Meanwhile, Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa warned on Saturday that diplomatic tension with Colombia will rise “if an Ecuadorean was among the dead,� in the March 1 raid Reuters has reported. “It would be extremely grave if it is proven that a Ecuadorean died. We will not let this murder go unpunished.�

Citing Uribe’s “dodgy dossier,� the Associated Press claims “that the FARC gave money to Correa’s 2006 presidential campaign.� Without skipping a beat, or apparently examining the files, denounced as forgeries by investigative journalist Greg Palast who actually did, the AP reporter avers, again citing Uribe that “Correa’s ally, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, planned to give the rebels US$300 million.�

As a key “private partner� of Plan Colombia, DynCorp’s aerial spraying of herbicides over portions of the Colombian countryside has caused wide-spread ecological damage with no discernible diminution of the flow of narcotics into Europe and the United States.

Indeed, according to a February 2008 report published by the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), “intensive aerial herbicide spraying of coca crops in Colombia has backfired badly, contributing to the spread of coca cultivation and cocaine production to new areas of the country and threatening human health and the environment.� The WOLA report, citing UN figures, goes on to describe how cocaine production in Colombia has risen from 617 metric tons in 2001 to 640 metric tons in 2005, a wretched failure considering the inestimable cost in human lives and habitat destruction.

Since 2002, congressional authorization for the program has permitted “counternarcotics� funds to be siphoned-off into scorched-earth counterinsurgency operations by the Colombian Army and their paramilitary allies. Some 300 U.S. Special Forces “advisors� serve as “mentors� to elite Army units in what has become another front in the U.S.-led “war on terror.�

Analyst Doug Stokes describes how Plan Colombia has morphed into an all-out war against Colombia’s left-wing opposition:

In the case of Colombia, civil society organizations, especially those that seek to challenge prevailing socio-economic conditions, are construed by the U.S. government as potentially subversive to the social and political order, and in the context of counter-insurgency, legitimate targets for “paramilitary, sabotage and/or terrorist� attack. [T]he 1991 post-Cold War U.S. reorganization of Colombian military and paramilitary networks and the massive levels of post-Cold War U.S. funding of the Colombian military serves to underline the continued relevance of counterinsurgency for destroying movements that may threaten a stability geared towards U.S. interests. (�The U.S. War of Terror in Colombia, Colombia Journal, December 2, 2002)

The controversial mercenary outfit, like its better-known cousin, Blackwater, has a dodgy history and has been fingered by investigators in human rights and other abuses in countries where it operates.

According to a CorpWatch profile,

DynCorp began in 1946 as a project of a small group of returning World War II pilots seeking to use their military contacts to make a living in the air cargo business. Named California Eastern Airways the original company was soon airlifting supplies to Asia used in the Korean War. By 2002 Dyncorp, headquartered in Reston, Virginia, was the nation’s 13th largest military contractor with $2.3 billion in revenue until it merged with Computer Sciences Corporation, an El Segundo, California-based technology services company, in an acquisition worth nearly $1 billion.

The company is not short on controversy. Under the Plan Colombia contract, the company has 88 aircraft and 307 employees–139 of them American–flying missions to eradicate coca fields in Colombia. Soldier of Fortune magazine once ran a cover story on DynCorp, proclaiming it “Colombia’s Coke-Bustin’ Broncos.� (�CSC/DynCorp,� Company Profiles, CorpWatch, no date)



While attempting to fly below the public radar, DynCorp’s questionable Plan Colombia operations surfaced when a group of Ecuadorean peasants filed a class action lawsuit against the outfit in 2001. The suit alleges that herbicides spread by DynCorp aircraft in Colombia drifted across the border, killing their crops and causing widespread livestock and human illnesses; in several cases, aerial fumigation led to the death of several children.

Washington responded by attempting to have the suit squashed. According to CorpWatch, “Assistant Secretary of State Rand Beers intervened in the case right away telling the judge the lawsuit posed ‘a grave risk to US national security and foreign policy objectives.’�

In a 2001 article profiling DynCorp’s Latin American operations, investigative reporter Jeremy Bigwood wrote,

DynCorp’s day to day operations are overseen by a secretive clique of officials in the State Department’s Narcotic Affairs Section (NAS) and the State Department’s Air Wing, a group that includes unreformed cold warriors and leftovers from the Central American wars of the 1980’s. Working hand-in-hand with U.S. military officials, Narcotic Affairs is supposed to be part of the drug war only, running the fumigation operations against drug crops. But there are indications that it is also involved in the counter-insurgency. In areas that are targeted for fumigation by Narcotic Affairs, Colombian right-wing paramilitaries arrive, sometimes by military helicopter, according to a human rights worker living in the Putumayo who asked for anonymity. Members of these paramilitaries “clear the ground� so that the planes spraying herbicides, often piloted by Americans, are not shot at by angry farmers or insurgents. (�DynCorp in Colombia: Outsourcing the Drug War,� CorpWatch, May 23, 2001)

Whether or not DynCorp pilots bombed Ecuador on behalf of America’s ally, the paramilitary-linked regime of Colombian president �lvaro Uribe, it is clear the United States will not willingly relinquish the Manta airbase when its lease expires in November 2009.

In 2001, a retired Ecuadorean army colonel, Fausto Cobo, told IPS that “Manta, for the purposes of Plan Colombia is a U.S. aircraft carrier, on land.�

As one of four “forward operating locations (FOLs), along with Curaçao, Aruba and El Salvador, Manta is a critical strategic base for U.S. “counternarcotics� and “counterinsurgency� operations in Latin America–and as a possible launching pad for an attack on Venezuela.

While the furor surrounding Colombia’s allegations against Ecuador and Venezuela may have fallen off the media’s radar, congressional efforts to have Venezuela declared “a state sponsor of terrorism,� have not.

In Latin America, the “public-private partnership� in repression with well-paid mercenary outfits like DynCorp taking the lead, it is a near certainty that incidents like the March 1 raid will continue as Washington seeks to shore-up the periphery of its shrinking imperialist empire.

Tom Burghardt is a researcher and activist based in the San Francisco Bay Area. In addition to publishing in Covert Action Quarterly, Love & Rage and Antifa Forum, he is the editor of Police State America: U.S. Military “Civil Disturbance� Planning, distributed by AK Press.

ColombianoGringo says on Mar 24, 15:57:

AK Press, Antifa(Anti Fascist), etc. This guy sounds like a really unbiased author.


From the AK Press website.

"Welcome to AK Press
Anarchist and radical book publishers and distributors. "

Mr. Hollywood says on Mar 24, 16:05:

That's "investigative journalism" that is transmitted through the dental filings of paranoid conspiracy theorists.

Why is it so hard to accept that the Colombian forces have been working their asses off for years to make this happen? And succeeded.

romy says on Mar 24, 16:12:

Hollywood, for me it's that there is a lack of history that would lead me to believe the Colombian forces could have carried this attack on their own. Besides, if the Americans are capable of outsourcing military operations why can't Colombians?

Mr. Hollywood says on Mar 24, 16:20:

Colombia has had the military tools they needed for a while. What they lacked was the ability to gather the necessary intelligence yet keep the planning of such an attack totally secret from the targets. If you remember, there was a bit of a scandal in the last year with certain high-ups in the Colombian military being accused of intelligence leaks to the FARC. Now those people are gone.

Now, Colombia may very well have been acting on intelligence provided by US sources (electronic evesdropping, satellite pictures...), and I wouldn't exactly be shocked if I learned that there were some elite US "observers" on the ground with the Colombians, but I'm very confident that the people and airplanes dropping the actual bombs on to Reyes and company were Colombian.

romy says on Mar 26, 20:22:

US support of Colombia FARC attack confirmed
Monday 24 March 2008
A top Colombian official admitted the March 1 attack on a Farc rebel camp inside Ecuador had been supported by US intelligence, but not US smart weapons. (Report: J. Fanciulli, A. Roy)

Colombia's March 1 attack on a rebel camp inside Ecuador was supported by US intelligence but did not use US bombs, a top Colombian official told AFP on Sunday, confirming widespread speculation.

"We didn't use smart weapons from the United States, we took some of the intelligence that country provided us and put it to use in our own arsenal, which ... is quite sophisticated," said the Defense Ministry official who asked not to be identified.

"We're winning the war on the FARC (rebels) thanks to the United States, who now shares information it previously withheld," the official added in what amounted to Colombia's first admission it used US intelligence in the attack.

Colombia's cross-border raid killed more than 20 people, including the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia's (FARC) second-in-command. But it also triggered a diplomatic row that saw Ecuadoran and Venezuelan troops mass at Colombia's border.

Tension subsided a week later with a handshake between the presidents of Colombia and Ecuador, but the leftist regimes of Quito and also Caracas -- which took Ecuador's side in the row -- insisted the attack had been carried out by US smart bombs.

After the attack, Colombia said it used ten conventional bombs fired from five Brazilian-made Super Tucano turboprop, light attack warplanes and three US-made A-37 jet fighters.

The defense ministry official said US help "was restricted to providing key intelligence directly to Colombian police, whose director (General Oscar Naranjo) is totally trusted by Washington."

Ecuadoran newspapers, however, said the Ecuadoran air force found that Colombia used ten 500-pound (227-kilogram) bombs, similar to those used by US forces in Iraq, which "cannot be transported by Colombian airplanes."

Ecuadoran authorities also noted that a few hours before the Colombian bombing raid, an HC-130 military aircraft had taken off from the US air base at Manta, in southeastern Ecuador.

The leftist FARC claim the raid was carried out by the US Southern Command and "their Colombian underlings."

Colombia's former deputy armed forces commander Nestor Ramirez said the attack could only have been carried out by Colombia's Super Tucano planes, since their ordnance have three guided systems that puts them within 30 centimeters (one foot) of the target.

More posts by the same author:

Other bad/good news 12

Other bad news 0

EE.UU. pide desestimar cargos de narcotráfico contra Simón Trinidad 3

Censura, falsa acusación de vocero de Alvaro Uribe Vélez y persecución a Iván Cepeda 26

Very funny ! 3

Alertan a testigo de parapolítica que puede ser asesinado en Canadá 0

I took Ecuador 18

Macabra orden de asesinato contra investigadores sociales 1

Detalles del testimonio que involucra a Uribe con masacre 4

La entrevista COMPLETA de Yidis Medina con Daniel Coronell. 12

El computador de Raul Reyes es la caja de Pandora que Bush ha regalado a Colombia 4

Cirugía para Colombia (Duro editorial de El País de España contra Uribe y la parapolítica en Colombia) 35

Entrevista a Salvatore Mancuso 9

Desplazados de Colombia 0

Uribe afirmó que investigan acusación en su contra por relación con masacre 0

Mancuso dijo que la mitad del Congreso tiene nexos con grupos armados 0

Protest Threats against Colombian Defender and her Family 7

Por parapolítica abren indagación preliminar a Nancy Patricia Gutiérrez, presidenta del Senado 0

Infiltraciones 'paras' en varios organismos reveló el ex jefe de informática del DAS, Rafael García 2

A new book : El narcotraficante nº 82 Alvaro Uribe Vélez. 19


If you're not a part of this travelicious experiment just yet, just sign up here. It's free & easy.

 

Colombia | Bolivia | India | Travelicious | Learn travel Spanish | Off Topic: do your thing

Whatchoo talking about Willis? (c) 1998 - 2008 Peter Van Dijck

Visit the Hungersite daily.